Letters: Sep. 15, 1967
(2 of 5)
Sir: Your POW camp training article [Sept. 1] revived memories of similar well-meaning efforts during and after the Korean War. Hardly a base, post or station was without its "torture and brainwash" school. All carried on with the best of intentions, of course. However, when all the evidence was in as to what actually went on in the POW camps of North Korea, it transpired that extremes of physical violence were the exceptions rather than the rule, occurring, it seems, to something like less than 1% of the prisoners. Mistreatment was far more apt to take psychological rather than physical forms. Our artillerymen are now (presumably) well aware of the extent to which they can be physically maltreated; are they equally aware of the far more common, insidious and infinitely more successful forms of psychological persuasion?
KEITH D. YOUNG
Major, U.S.A.F.
U.S. Air Force Academy
Colorado Springs, Colo.
Uncommon Bigot
Sir: George Lincoln Rockwell [Sept. 1] was not a common hatemonger or backwoods bigot. He was the embodiment of forensic eloquence and razor-sharp intelligence, both of which had been honed to a hair-thin cutting edge. His physical stature emitted strength as well as fear. The real tragedy of Commander Rockwell's demise is that such quality and potential leadership were befouled by a twisted alignment with a vociferous band of homicidal psychopaths and miscellaneous social rejects. It is my sincere conviction that if this man had not permitted himself to become encased in the morass that is the Nazi ideology, he would have served his nation with excellence as a U.S. Senator or perhaps a Cabinet officer. His combat record attests to this postulation.
Please comprehend that in no manner or form do I endorse the tenets of Nazism. I reject the entire Nazi philosophy. I only wish that Commander Rockwell had done the same.
DAVID
Louis Houston
Welcome to the Club
Sir: Your article on the misfortunes of Clarence Jackson [Sept. 1] brings to mind certain questions about our American judiciary system. What is wrong when an honest man like Jackson, who is trying to stand up for his rights, loses all that he has through legal processes? Yet, elsewhere, certain persons travel over the country inciting riots and committing treasonable acts, and nothing happens to them. Do we really have a democratic judiciary system or one that protects the criminal and prosecutes the innocent?
JEFF MORELOCK
Cleveland, Tenn.
Sir: Tell me has the American Bar Association yet bestirred itself to say "ho-hum" or anything?
ROBERT W.L. SMITH Ann Arbor, Mich.
Sir: Under the circumstances, we feel compelled to offer Mr. Jackson membership to the hallowed halls of Losers Incorporated. In this case, we will waive the initiation fee and annual dues.
JOHN H. KOLHOVEN
Chairman of the Board
Losers Incorporated
La Crosse, Wis.
A Huff & a Puff
- « PREV PAGE
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- NEXT PAGE »
Most Popular »
- Five Things the U.S. Can Learn from China
- World Leaders Put Off a Climate Change Treaty
- China Investigates Deaths After Swine Flu Shot
- How a Bank Robber Became an Antihero in France
- Good and Bad News for Boxing: Only One Pacquiao
- The Prisoner Review: A Pretentious Reimagining
- Box Office Weekend: 2012 Masters Disaster
- The Meaning and Mythos of Manny Pacquiao
- Happiness Paradox: Why Are Americans So Cheery?
- YouTube Effect: Making Money From Viral Videos
- Five Things the U.S. Can Learn from China
- China Investigates Deaths After Swine Flu Shot
- Good and Bad News for Boxing: Only One Pacquiao
- Happiness Paradox: Why Are Americans So Cheery?
- Did a Time-Traveling Bird Sabotage the Collider?
- Dubai: 10 Things to Do in 24 Hours
- In Fight Against AIDS, Kenya Confronts Gay Taboo
- How a Bank Robber Became an Antihero in France
- Shanghai: 10 Things to Do in 24 Hours
- Why Legalizing Marijuana Makes Sense







RSS