The Supreme Court: A Seat for Mediocrity?
As the Senate last week began its long-awaited floor debate on President Nixon's latest choice for the Supreme Court, opponents and at least a few supporters of the nominee seemed agreed on one point: Judge G. Harrold Carswell is a mediocre choice. Far from denying it, Carswell's advocates almost claimed mediocrity as his prime qualification.
"Does it not seem that we have had enough of those upsidedown, corkscrew thinkers?" Louisiana's Russell Long asked. "Would it not appear that it might be well to take a B student or a C student who was...
To read the entire article, you must be a TIME subscriber. Already registered? Sign in below
Current print subscribers to register
Subscribe now to get TIME All Access
Email, Password or Region is incorrect
A required form parameter was missing.
The System is currently down. Please try again in a few minutes.
Email Address is invalid
Password is blank
Most Popular »
- Watch: Dan Savage Leaves Stephen Speechless on 'Colbert Report'
- 'Anonymous' Knocks CIA Site Offline
- Why American Kids Are Brats
- Icelanders Avoid Inbreeding Through Online Incest Database
- Desperately Seeking Susan Powell: A Best Friend's Quest
- Seriously This Time: Chad Ochocinco Says He Will Change His Name
- The Grand Canyon Bans Sales of Bottled Water
- World Press Photo Awards Announced
- Happy Birthday, Opportunity! Mars Rover Turns 8
- Mired in the Sticky Politics of Health and Faith, Obama Shifts on Contraception
- God vs. Science
- The Rise and Fall of One of the World's Worst-Performing Stock Markets
- New York City: 10 Things to Do
- Nation: Where the Polls Went Wrong
- How City Lights Are Snuffing Out the Stars
- Friends With Benefits
- The Only Child: Debunking the Myths
- What Happens When We Die?
- Study: Children of Lesbians May Do Better Than Their Peers




