A Right Start That Could Go Wrong
Diplomacy and patience will still be needed
It was widely hailed as a victory for patient U.S. diplomacy. After years of hostility, both South Africa and the militant South West African People's Organization (SWAPO) agreed to let the United Nations oversee the transition to independence of Namibia (South West Africa). But as events unfolded in the Venezuela-sized, mineral-rich territory last week, it became clear that much more patience and diplomacy will be needed, before South Africa relinquishes control over the land It has ruled since 1919 under an international mandate, that the U.N. revoked in 1966. As a U.S. official warned last week: "Things could always go wrong."
The U.N. effort is most likely to founder over the future of Walvis Bay, Namibia's principal port (see box). Pretoria wants to trade the harbor for a cooperative attitude from the new Namibian regime after it takes power. SWAPO insists that Walvis Bay, through which 90% of the territory's international trade passes, must become part of Namibia now.
The transition plan could also go astray simply because of the deep distrust the South Africans have for the U.N. Last week the organization's newly appointed special representative, Martti Ahtisaari, arrived in the territorial capital of Windhoek with the first contingent of a U.N. supervisory force that may eventually grow to 5,000 troops and 1,000 civilians. Ahtisaari, a former Finnish Ambassador to Tanzania, will meet with stonewalling cynicism from whites, who fully expect him to favor the guerrillas in any disagreement. One such skeptic is Brian O'Linn, Secretary-General of the Namibia National Front, a newly formed multiracial attempt to steer between SWAPO and its major opponent, the South African-backed Democratic Turnhalle Alliance. Says O'Linn, "the deep suspicion South Africans have about the U.N. can only be alleviated. I doubt if it will ever be resolved."
Ahtisaari faces more than psychological roadblocks. By the end of August he is supposed to submit to U.N. Secretary-General Kurt Waldheim a plan for a truce between the guerrillas and South African troops, as well as a blueprint for the election of a constituent assembly that will draft a constitution for independent Namibia. Pretoria has warned that it may reject any recommendation Ahtisaari comes up with. Meanwhile both sides have adopted a "you first" attitude that will make a cease-fire difficult to achieve. As guerrillas under his command blew up a vital water line in northern Namibia, SWAPO Leader Sam Nujoma declared that "prospects for free, fair and democratic elections are increasingly doubtful, if not untenable." Until South Africa confines its 10,000 or so Namibian troops to then-bases, said Nujoma, he will not order his guerrillas to lay down their arms. The South Africans retorted that there could be no confinement or withdrawal until a cease-fire had been arranged.
- 1
- 2
- NEXT PAGE »
Most Popular »
- Why Obama's Afghan War is Different
- How Medicated Was Michael Jackson?
- Why Sarah Palin Quit as Governor
- Searching for Palin's 'Hot Photos'
- Behind North Korea's Missile Launch
- When Benedict Meets Barack
- Afterbirth: It's What's For Dinner
- TIME's Summer Reading List
- What Michael Jackson Did on His Last Day
- Asian Film Fireworks for the Fourth
- Why Obama's Afghan War is Different
- Afterbirth: It's What's For Dinner
- How Medicated Was Michael Jackson?
- How to Moonwalk like Michael
- When Benedict Meets Barack
- Why Marriage Matters
- Cinema: Senory Senora
- Asian Film Fireworks for the Fourth
- What Michael Jackson Did on His Last Day
- Canada Spends Big to Save GM, So Why Not Mexico?







RSS