AFRICA: Moscow's Risky Bid for Influence

"Unless the Soviet Union shows restraint in its foreign policy actions, the situation in our relationship is bound to become more tense."

Thus, at a Washington press conference, Secretary of State Henry Kissinger last week once again warned Moscow to stop its massive support of the Popular Movement for the Liberation of Angola (M.P.L.A.) faction in Angola's civil war. Soviet "actions in Angola [are] incompatible with a relaxation of tensions," added Kissinger. Moscow quickly indicated that it was not heeding Kissinger's threat. Declared the government newspaper Izvestia: "Support for the national liberation struggles is an important principle of Soviet foreign policy."

Although the Russians have backed the M.P.L.A. for more than a decade, Africa has rarely been a top priority of Soviet foreign policy. In recent years though, the continent has become more important to Moscow, for two reasons: 1) as an arena in which to challenge the Chinese for the ideological allegiance of the underdeveloped countries; and 2) as the source of potential air and naval bases from which Soviet influence could be extended into the Indian and Atlantic oceans. Even if Russia's client rebels lose the civil war in Angola, Moscow still has several toeholds on the continent (see map).

On Africa's west coast, for example, Guinea has been a faithful ally of Russia since 1959. Soviet naval units call regularly at Conakry's fine harbor, where they stock up on fuel and supplies for mid-Atlantic patrols. The Red fleet also regularly puts into ports in the Congo (Brazzaville) and Equatorial Guinea. On the east coast of the continent, Soviet planes and warships use bases in Somalia from which they patrol the Indian Ocean and the Strait of Hormuz, which leads to the oil-rich Persian Gulf. At Berbera the Soviets are completing a sophisticated installation capable of maintaining and arming lethal ship-to-ship missiles.

The victory of a pro-Soviet regime in Angola would enable Moscow to complete its network of African bases. The small, sleepy fishing village of Baia dos Tigres (Tiger Bay), for instance, has a superb deepwater anchorage; it could readily be developed into a base that would make it easy for Soviet ships to patrol the South Atlantic and, in the event of a confrontation with the West, intercept oil tankers from the Persian Gulf.

Selective Grants. Since 1959 Moscow has pumped $788 million in aid into sub-Saharan Africa. Compared with other donors, the Russians have not been generous; in the same period, the West has given Black Africa $2.5 billion, China has given $1.8 billion, and the World Bank has provided $1 billion. But the Soviets have been highly selective in their grants to ensure maximum impact. Somalia, for example, has received only $60 million from Moscow in the past year, but it came at a crucial moment. When drought and famine hit the country in late 1974, the Soviets stepped in quickly and efficiently; within a few weeks they had airlifted 120,000 starving nomads from the parched interior to camps near the coast and provided experts to retrain them as fishermen and farmers. In other states, such as Uganda and Angola, the U.S.S.R. has gained friends by providing military equipment and advisers.

Quotes of the Day »

Get & Share
JOE LIEBERMAN, a Senator from Connecticut, on his refusal to support a health care reform bill that includes a public option
For use in rail of Articles page or Section Fronts pages. Duplicate and change name as necesssary to distinguish.

Time.com on Digg

POWERED BY digg

Quotes of the Day »

Get & Share
JOE LIEBERMAN, a Senator from Connecticut, on his refusal to support a health care reform bill that includes a public option

Stay Connected with TIME.com