Business: The Burns-Carter Not-Quite Fight
Are President Carter and Federal Reserve Board Chairman Arthur Burns battling like Muhammad Ali and Joe Frazier? Well, not quite. They do have their differences, and serious ones. Two weeks ago, the White House indicated that further tightening of the money supply by the Federal Reserve might endanger the U.S. economic recovery. Last week Burns replied somewhat testily. In a speech at Gonzaga University in Spokane, Wash., he said he had no intention of "letting the money supply grow at a rate that will fuel the fires of inflation." He added that unless Government policies shift to bolster business confidence, unemployment may remain high, and the economy could soon slip into another recession.
Burns, however, may have come on unnecessarily strong; the Administration started the squabble by ineptness rather than intention. In order to reply more fully to a reporter's routine question about monetary policy, a White House aide tacked up in the pressroom excerpts from an Oct. 4 speech by Charles Schultze, chairman of the Council of Economic Advisers. In the talk, Schultze deplored high interest rates and argued that a rapid expansion of the money supply would be inflationary only if the economy were more vigorous than it is. Reporters understandably Interpreted the notice as a special White House statement attacking Burns —to the Administration's subsequent embarrassment. Says one economic aide: "In no way was this intended to be a signal."
At week's end both sides were moving to cool it. Carter at his press conference went out of his way to praise Burns as an "able, outspoken and independent man" and agree with him that business profits should be going up faster. Federal Reserve officials, on their part, stressed that an increase last week in the discount rate—the interest rate on federal loans to banks—from 5%% to 6%, was not intended to defy the White House. The increase had been decided on before the Schultze statement was posted on the pressroom wall; it was only half as large as Wall Street had expected, and it only brings the discount rate closer to other interest rates that the board had pushed up earlier. Federal Reserve Governor Henry Wallich told TIME, "Quite honestly, this talk of a dispute has been greatly overdone. Believe me, there just aren't any profound disagreements."
That may be soft-pedaling too much.
- 1
- 2
- NEXT PAGE »
Most Popular »
- Sex, Please, We're British: London's Erotica Expo
- The Growing Backlash Against Overparenting
- The '00s: Goodbye (at Last) to the Decade From Hell
- How a California Judge Is Challenging Obama on Gay Rights
- Toilets
- Zhu Zhu Mania: Hamster Toys Are Ruling Christmas
- Obama's 'Mistakes': Way Too Early to Judge
- Woman Loses Benefits over Facebook Photo
- East Antarctica, Long Stable, Is Now Losing Ice
- The Fall of Greg Craig, Obama's Top Lawyer
- The Growing Backlash Against Overparenting
- Zhu Zhu Mania: Hamster Toys Are Ruling Christmas
- Toilets
- Obama's 'Mistakes': Way Too Early to Judge
- Sex, Please, We're British: London's Erotica Expo
- How a California Judge Is Challenging Obama on Gay Rights
- East Antarctica, Long Stable, Is Now Losing Ice
- The '00s: Goodbye (at Last) to the Decade From Hell
- Why Exercise Won't Make You Thin
- Will Private Equity Be the Next Meltdown?







RSS