Magazine content is available exclusively for TIME subscribers.Law: Darwin Wins
Creationism "is not science "
The Arkansas law had a surface plausibility: it merely required that if public schools teach the theories of "evolution science," they must also teach the theories of "creation science." But last week Federal Judge William Overton had little trouble determining that something constitutionally improper was going on under that surface. "The two-model approach of the creationists is simply a contrived dualism," wrote the judge. Creation science "is not science because it depends upon supernatural intervention, which is not guided by natural law." And since it is not science,...
Email, Password or Region is incorrect
A required form parameter was missing.
The System is currently down. Please try again in a few minutes.
Email Address is invalid
Password is blank
Most Popular »
- Your Turn, Canada: A Second-By-Second Look at Jeremy Lin Lighting Up Toronto
- What's in Your Lipstick? FDA Finds Lead in 400 Shades
- Linsanity Heads East, Linfects China and Taiwan
- Iowa Welcomes Back China's Next President
- Love Ever After: A Valentine’s Day Special
- Can Jeremy Lin End The MSG/Time Warner Cable War?
- Rick Santorum Wants to Fight 'The Dangers Of Contraception'
- After Whitney Houston, Musicians Say: I'm Afraid
- 50 Best iPhone Apps 2012
- Top 10 Famous Love Letters
- Iowa Welcomes Back China's Next President
- With Syria's Rebels: A Visit to a Bombmaker's Factory
- Harvard's Hoops Star Is Asian. Why's That a Problem?
- Study: Lead Poisoning Could Lurk in Spices
- Beirut: Where Valentine's Day Belongs to Another Kind of Saint
- Friends With Benefits
- Europe's Deep Freeze: Why Climate Change Is Not (Entirely) to Blame
- The Upside Of Being An Introvert (And Why Extroverts Are Overrated)
- Los Angeles: 10 Things to Do
- Children of the New India: How Economic Reforms Impacted Upon the Young
More News from Our Partners
Top Stories on TIME.com
Quotes of the Day »
