A Clear Statement of Disapproval
The U.S. condemns apartheid as "morally wrong"
The Reagan Administration has rarely had much to say about South Africa's official policy of racial discrimination, known as apartheid, but its attitudes toward the country have often seemed sympathetic to the government of Prime Minister P.W. Botha. Last week the State Department moved to counter criticism that the U.S. is too closely aligned to the all-white regime. In what was billed as a major policy speech, Under Secretary of State Lawrence Eagleburger firmly denounced South Africa's political system as "morally wrong." Said he: "We must reject the legal and political premises and consequences of apartheid."
Eagleburger also hinted that the U.S. would soon intensify efforts toward a breakthrough on one of Africa's most intractable problems: independence for Namibia, a vast, mineral-rich territory controlled by neighboring South Africa. President Reagan, he said, was prepared to use "his full influence" to promote a compromise that would involve the withdrawal of South Africa from Namibia in return for the removal of 30,000 Cuban troops from Marxist Angola.
The speech was more notable for its clarity in spelling out the U.S. position than for any bold departures from past practice. Endorsing a policy that has been pursued consistently by previous Administrations, Eagleburger rejected economic sanctions as a way to influence the South African government. Instead, he reaffirmed the U.S. goal of encouraging the Botha government to make small reforms, in the expectation that they will lead to larger ones. Said he: "U.S. interests are best served by encouraging the change that is now under way in South Africa."
Signs of improvement, Eagleburger noted, include the South African government's 1979 decision to grant blacks the right to form trade unions, a court ruling earlier this month that enabled some blacks to become permanent residents in urban areas, and Prime Minister Botha's plan, announced last year, to grant Asians and mixed-race "coloreds" a limited role in a white-dominated Parliament. By contrast, Eagleburger charged, any campaign to encourage U.S. companies to divest themselves of their holdings in South Africa would only "assure America's irrelevance to South Africa's future."
- 1
- 2
- NEXT PAGE »
Most Popular »
- The '00s: Goodbye (at Last) to the Decade From Hell
- Scientology : The Thriving Cult of Greed and Power
- Workers of the World vs. China Inc.
- The Growing Backlash Against Overparenting
- Why Ireland Is Running Out of Priests
- Germany's Doubts About Afghanistan Grow After Revelations About Air Strike
- Backing Up Files Online: It's Good to Mozy Along
- Florida Grapples With Its Deadly Hit-and-Run Car Culture
- Energizer Bunnies: Turning Rabbits into Green Fuel
- Obama's 'Mistakes': Way Too Early to Judge
- The Growing Backlash Against Overparenting
- Backing Up Files Online: It's Good to Mozy Along
- Workers of the World vs. China Inc.
- Why Ireland Is Running Out of Priests
- Scientology : The Thriving Cult of Greed and Power
- The '00s: Goodbye (at Last) to the Decade From Hell
- How Guatemala's Most Beautiful Lake Turned Ugly
- Sex, Television and Berlusconi's Path to Power
- Awaking From a Coma: What Did the Doctors Miss?
- Energizer Bunnies: Turning Rabbits into Green Fuel







RSS