Beirut:The Post-Mortem Goes On
Marine sentries who had not been allowed to insert ammunition in their weapons three weeks ago now stand guard with fully loaded guns. Some of those who had been based in Beirut were being billeted on American ships and ferried ashore by helicopters. Others were hard at work building new fortifications. Most guard posts were being reinforced and rearmed. Six-foot-high mounds of dirt, rows of tar-filled steel drums, sandbags and concertina wire blocked off the entrance to the Marine compound. Ironically, the little-used route through the parking lot that had been followed by a suicide bomber on Oct. 23, killing more than 230 U.S. servicemen, became the only approach to the headquarters. Heaps of dirt were spread around the lot to force approaching traffic to slow down.
All these measures simply underscored the continuing questions about whether the headquarters security had been adequate in the first place. Why hadn't Marine commanders taken precautions earlier, particularly after the car bombing of the U.S. embassy in Beirut last April? Why were the Marines on guard duty not carrying loaded weapons? And why were so many Marines quartered in a single building, concentrating them as a target in an area prone to terrorist attacks? These were some of the questions that were raised on Capitol Hill last week as both
the Senate and House Armed Services committees opened investigations. Their main witness:
Marine Commandant General Paul X. Kelley, who had just returned from a fact-finding trip to Lebanon.
Kelley insisted that "security was adequate for what any responsible and prudent commander should have expected."
But committee members were not persuaded by Kelley's assertion that despite the embassy attack, "no one anticipated" that a terrorist using a five-ton truck would be able to crash through Marine defenses. As Maine's Senator William Cohen put it, "It's not a leap of logic to see if they bomb you with a car, they can bomb you with a truck."
Asked Senator Gary Hart of Colorado: "Have we always attempted to defend against future threats based on precedents from the past? Are we still operating under the delusion that our enemies will not be imaginative and inventive?"
Kelley explained that Marines can load their rifles in "two seconds" and "in my professional judgment, it would have been impossible to stop the truck with small-arms fire." Retorted Kentucky's Representative Larry Hopkins: "Maybe the M-16 would not have stopped the truck. We'll never know. But one thing we do know is that an empty M-16 couldn't have stopped the truck." In fact, during last week's almost identical attack on an Israeli military headquarters in southern Lebanon, an Israeli guard did shoot the driver, causing the truck to explode sooner than it otherwise might havethus probably causing fewer casualties.
- 1
- 2
- NEXT PAGE »
Most Popular »
- The '00s: Goodbye (at Last) to the Decade From Hell
- The Growing Backlash Against Overparenting
- Obama's 'Mistakes': Way Too Early to Judge
- One Year After the Mumbai Massacre, a Trial Plods on
- Ahmadinejad in Brazil: Why Lula Defies the U.S.
- In His Cave, a Palestinian Farmer Makes a Stand
- Me and Orson Welles: Zac Efron Takes the Stage
- California Judge Challenging Obama on Gay Rights
- The Fall of Greg Craig, Obama's Top Lawyer
- Zhu Zhu Mania: Hamster Toys Are Ruling Christmas
- The Growing Backlash Against Overparenting
- The '00s: Goodbye (at Last) to the Decade From Hell
- Five Things the U.S. Can Learn from China
- Obama's 'Mistakes': Way Too Early to Judge
- The Dark Side of Darwin's Legacy
- California Judge Challenging Obama on Gay Rights
- Zhu Zhu Mania: Hamster Toys Are Ruling Christmas
- Think Big with an African Ocean Safari
- In His Cave, a Palestinian Farmer Makes a Stand
- Ahmadinejad in Brazil: Why Lula Defies the U.S.







RSS