Shultz, Weinberger
Though both the Secretary of State and the Secretary of Defense opposed the arms-for-hostages proposal from the start, neither moved forcefully to stop the initiative. "Secretary Shultz specifically requested to be informed only as necessary to perform his job," the commission found. "Secretary Weinberger had access through intelligence to details about the operation. Their obligation was to give the President their full support and continued advice with respect to the program or, if they could not in conscience do that, to so inform the President. Instead, they simply distanced themselves from the program. They protected the record as to their own positions on this issue. They were not energetic in attempting to protect the President from the consequences of his personal commitment to freeing the hostages."
Most Popular »
- The Fort Hood Killer: Terrified ... or Terrorist?
- Did a Time-Traveling Bird Sabotage the Collider?
- Another Cause of Obesity: The Bacteria in Your Gut?
- Rape and the Plight of the Female Migrant Worker
- Why Did the Iraq Surge Work?
- Star Soccer Player's Suicide Leaves Germany Stunned
- Renting Your House Back: A Solution to Foreclosures?
- Recession Sparks Global Shoplifting Spree
- The Rogue Returns: On the Road with Sarah Palin
- Can the Dems Keep Putting Up with Joe Lieberman?
- Another Cause of Obesity: The Bacteria in Your Gut?
- The Fort Hood Killer: Terrified ... or Terrorist?
- Did a Time-Traveling Bird Sabotage the Collider?
- Renting Your House Back: A Solution to Foreclosures?
- Recession Sparks Global Shoplifting Spree
- Rape and the Plight of the Female Migrant Worker
- Star Soccer Player's Suicide Leaves Germany Stunned
- Are You Getting Scammed by Facebook Games?
- Why Did the Iraq Surge Work?







RSS