|
|
- NEWSLETTERS
- MOBILE APPS
-
ADD TIME NEWS
Shultz, Weinberger
Though both the Secretary of State and the Secretary of Defense opposed the arms-for-hostages proposal from the start, neither moved forcefully to stop the initiative. "Secretary Shultz specifically requested to be informed only as necessary to perform his job," the commission found. "Secretary Weinberger had access through intelligence to details about the operation. Their obligation was to give the President their full support and continued advice with respect to the program or, if they could not in conscience do that, to so inform the President. Instead, they simply distanced themselves from the program. They protected the record as to their own positions on this issue. They were not energetic in attempting to protect the President from the consequences of his personal commitment to freeing the hostages."
Most Popular »
- No Churchgoing Christmas for the First Family
- Why Brittany Murphy Is Worth Remembering
- How Panera Bread Defies the Recession
- Israel vs. Hizballah: Drumbeats of War
- The Pentagon Prepares for a Missile Attack from 'Iran'
- Obama, a Favorite Son, Will Perk Up Hawaii's Holidays
- In Germany, a Disturbing Rise of Right-Wing Violence
- Has the Alleged Fort Hood Gunman's Imam Been Silenced?
- Climate Change: How Fast Is the Earth Shifting?
- Sean Goldman: Home by Christmas
- No Churchgoing Christmas for the First Family
- How Panera Bread Defies the Recession
- Climate Change: How Fast Is the Earth Shifting?
- Holland's Plan to Tax Every Kilometer Driven
- Mexico City's Revolutionary First: Gay Marriage
- In Germany, a Disturbing Rise of Right-Wing Violence
- Has the Alleged Fort Hood Gunman's Imam Been Silenced?
- The Pentagon Prepares for a Missile Attack from 'Iran'
- Why Brittany Murphy Is Worth Remembering
- Domestic Terror Incidents Hit a Peak in 2009





RSS