Shortening The Tether on Bankers
Ronald Reagan's dream of carrying out a sweeping deregulation of the U.S. economy has stirred a powerful backlash on Capitol Hill. Never has that been more apparent than last week, when Congress passed its first comprehensive piece of banking legislation since 1982. The White House had hoped the bill would remove many of the governmental shackles that inhibit competition between banks, securities firms and other institutions in the burgeoning field of financial services. In fact, it does just the opposite.
The new legislation reinforces restrictions on the financial industry and adds some new regulatory safeguards to protect the rights of the consumer. The bill also strengthens the Government's role in lifting the struggling savings and loan industry out of its troubles. Said New York Democrat Charles Schumer, a member of the House Banking Committee: "There is one major message in this bill -- the rapid roll toward deregulation has ceased."
Despite his reservations about many of the provisions, the President is expected to sign the bill into law soon. At one point the White House threatened to veto the legislation, but the Administration realized that a rescue of the savings and loan business could no longer be postponed. The White House agreed to put aside its demands for banking deregulation in exchange for passage by Congress of a $10.8 billion bailout for the S and Ls.
That money will go to the embattled Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation. Last year, as the FSLIC drained its coffers to prop up ailing S and Ls, the agency wound up with a $6.3 billion deficit. At the moment, 460 thrift institutions, primarily in the depressed Southwest, are insolvent. Some industry experts estimate that the FSLIC's liabilities could ultimately reach $40 billion.
The $10.8 billion rescue package is the first step toward paying that bill. The funds will not come directly from the Treasury but will be raised through the issuance of special Government bonds. Interest on those bonds will be paid with additional insurance premiums that the FSLIC will levy on the savings and loans. The bolstering of the FSLIC should provide reassurance to depositors, many of whom have been concerned that the federal insurance funds could run out of money.
, Depositors also had reason to cheer a provision in the new law that would speed up check clearing. For years, customers at many banks have complained that when they deposit checks, those funds may not become available for two weeks or more. Meanwhile, depositors are often unable to pay bills on time, or the checks that they write bounce because of "insufficient funds." The Consumer Federation of America estimates that Americans pay as much as $300 million a year in fees for bounced checks or finance charges for late payments as a result of slow check clearing. But beginning Sept. 1, 1988, banks will have to clear checks drawn on local institutions within two working days, while out-of-state checks must clear after six business days. In 1990 those intervals will be further reduced, to one and four days respectively.
- 1
- 2
- NEXT PAGE »
Most Popular »
- The Growing Backlash Against Overparenting
- Super-Crocodiles May Have Dined on Dinosaurs
- Toilets
- Woman Loses Benefits over Facebook Photo
- Amid Concern About India's Lost Clout, Singh Goes to Washington
- Will Private Equity Be the Next Meltdown?
- The Fall of Greg Craig, Obama's Top Lawyer
- Why Exercise Won't Make You Thin
- The Political Fallout of Egypt's Soccer War
- Can the A380 Bring the Party Back to the Skies?
- The Growing Backlash Against Overparenting
- Will Private Equity Be the Next Meltdown?
- Super-Crocodiles May Have Dined on Dinosaurs
- Toilets
- Why Exercise Won't Make You Thin
- Troubling Rise of Facebook's Top Game Company
- Can the A380 Bring the Party Back to the Skies?
- Amid Concern About India's Lost Clout, Singh Goes to Washington
- The Fall of Greg Craig, Obama's Top Lawyer
- How One Army Town Copes With Post- Traumatic Stress






RSS