Prime Time
A group of TV executives from Eastern Europe confessed at a CNN conference last month that the newly freed TV channels in their countries have left viewers bored. The problem: too much news and not enough entertainment. Just another case where the former Soviet empire has a lot of catching up to do & with the West. In the jaded U.S., viewers are bored with entertainment and can't seem to get enough news.
At least, they can't get enough of the networks' prime-time news programs. CBS's venerable 60 Minutes, the closest thing to a perpetual-motion machine yet developed by network TV, is riding higher than ever as the most watched show on television. ABC's PrimeTime Live, after a rocky shakedown period, has emerged as a solid ratings success, while its older sibling, 20/20, is still going strong after 13 seasons. Back at CBS, 48 Hours (which departs from the newsmagazine format by focusing on one subject for an hour in cinema-verite fashion) has become a sleeper hit and has even generated a spin-off: Street Stories, which did well enough in four outings last month to win a renewal through the summer.
These shows are increasingly the forum of choice for headlinemakers. Democratic presidential contender Bill Clinton and his wife Hillary went on 60 Minutes to respond to charges of marital infidelity -- breaking their plans to appear on other news interview shows in order to ensure a bigger audience. Patricia Bowman, the woman who accused William Kennedy Smith of rape, shed her anonymity with Diane Sawyer on PrimeTime Live. Anita Hill appeared last week on 60 Minutes for her first TV interview since the Clarence Thomas hearings.
The boom shows no signs of slackening. NBC, the one network conspicuously left off the prime-time news bandwagon, will try again in late March with a new show, Dateline NBC, co-anchored by Jane Pauley and Stone Phillips. And ABC is currently assembling the staff for yet another news hour, which will compete head-to-head with 60 Minutes on Sunday nights, perhaps as early as this summer.
From the networks' standpoint, the shows make economic sense: they cost only half as much to produce as entertainment programs, and a successful one can run virtually forever. Viewers, for their part, may be turning to news out of exasperation with the sameness of network entertainment fare. Andrew Heyward, executive producer of 48 Hours, theorizes that short newsmagazine segments suit the habits of zap-happy viewers. "Unlike a drama show," he says, "you don't have to watch the whole hour to get something out of it." PrimeTime Live executive producer Richard Kaplan contends that people are "hungry for information," possibly because of the hard economic times. "Maybe there's a correlation between people's interest in what's going on and their own economic situation," he says.
- 1
- 2
- NEXT PAGE »
Most Popular »
- Sex, Please, We're British: London's Erotica Expo
- The '00s: Goodbye (at Last) to the Decade From Hell
- The Growing Backlash Against Overparenting
- California Judge Challenging Obama on Gay Rights
- Obama's 'Mistakes': Way Too Early to Judge
- Zhu Zhu Mania: Hamster Toys Are Ruling Christmas
- Toilets
- The Fall of Greg Craig, Obama's Top Lawyer
- Woman Loses Benefits over Facebook Photo
- East Antarctica, Long Stable, Is Now Losing Ice
- The Growing Backlash Against Overparenting
- Zhu Zhu Mania: Hamster Toys Are Ruling Christmas
- The '00s: Goodbye (at Last) to the Decade From Hell
- Obama's 'Mistakes': Way Too Early to Judge
- California Judge Challenging Obama on Gay Rights
- Toilets
- Sex, Please, We're British: London's Erotica Expo
- Will Private Equity Be the Next Meltdown?
- East Antarctica, Long Stable, Is Now Losing Ice
- Why Exercise Won't Make You Thin







RSS