|
|
- NEWSLETTERS
- MOBILE APPS
-
ADD TIME NEWS
Oops ... Wrong Answer
The Hubble Space Telescope has performed some spectacular feats of science since a crew of astronauts heroically corrected the instrument's blurred vision last December. The orbiting observatory has snapped dramatic pictures & of the comet Shoemaker-Levy 9 smashing into Jupiter, discovered hundreds of what seem to be solar systems in the making, and provided proof that giant black holes lurk in the cores of galaxies. But all this was just a warm-up for the Hubble's most eagerly awaited mission: to gauge the age of the universe. The question of how old the heavens are is not only fascinating in its own right but also bears directly on just about every other major cosmic mystery from the universe's history to its eventual fate.
Last week the Hubble delivered its preliminary verdict: the universe is between 8 billion and 12 billion years old. That may seem imprecise, but it was specific enough to throw astrophysicists into a state of high anxiety. The problem: our own galaxy has stars believed to be as much as 14 billion to 16 billion years old. And it makes astronomers more than a little uncomfortable to try to explain how stars could have formed before the universe began. Says Alexei Filippenko, a University of California, Berkeley, astronomer who was on the team that made the Hubble observations: "This is fantastic stuff ... it might lead to a revolution in cosmology."
If the Hubble figure for the universe's age is confirmed by more studies, something has to give. Perhaps astrophysicists don't understand stars as well as they thought -- but that's considered unlikely. An alternative idea is downright shocking: something may be wrong with the revered theory that the universe began with a Big Bang and has been expanding ever since.
The team used a clever, indirect method of measuring the age of the universe. First the scientists determined the distance to a group of galaxies called the Virgo cluster. Then they took advantage of a trick first used by Edwin Hubble, the astronomer who discovered, back in the 1920s, that the universe is expanding -- and for whom the space telescope was named. If the whole cosmos is blowing up like a balloon, Hubble reasoned, then you can calculate backward to see when the balloon began to inflate.
You can, that is, as long as you know the rate of expansion. Formally known as the Hubble constant, this expansion factor is calculated by measuring the distance from our galaxy to other galaxies (something difficult to do) and determining how fast that distance is increasing (an easier task). Scientists look for particular kinds of stars, called Cepheid variables, because they know the inherent brightness of these stars. The fainter they appear here on earth, the farther away they are, and the distance can be roughly calculated. As researchers find Cepheids farther and farther away, calculations of the Hubble constant become more and more accurate.
- 1
- 2
- NEXT PAGE »
Most Popular »
- Why Obama Has to Worry About Polls
- The Pentagon Prepares for a Missile Attack from 'Iran'
- Israel vs. Hizballah: Drumbeats of War
- Will Your Next Car be Made in India?
- Dear President Obama: What North Korea Might Say
- In Cleveland, Worker Co-Ops Look to a Spanish Model
- The '00s: Goodbye (at Last) to the Decade from Hell
- Stalemate: How Obama's Iran Outreach Failed
- Top Stocks of the Decade
- Made in India: The $12,000 Electric Car
- In Cleveland, Worker Co-Ops Look to a Spanish Model
- Why Obama Has to Worry About Polls
- Dear President Obama: What North Korea Might Say
- Will Your Next Car be Made in India?
- Forcing Insurers to Spend Enough on Health Care
- The Importance of Economic Equality
- Despite Aid, Yemen Faces Growing Al-Qaeda Threat
- Top Stocks of the Decade
- Have Yourself a Sandinista Christmas...
- Agent Orange Poisons New Generations in Vietnam





RSS