|
|
- NEWSLETTERS
- MOBILE APPS
-
ADD TIME NEWS
Put The Two Johns In The Ring
John Kerry was annoyed. "I need some food, guys," he huffed at staff, in a moment captured by ABC news. "I can't thrive on nothing." But then, everyone associated with the Democratic primaries seemed slightly annoyed last week. And flu-ridden and exhausted and discombobulated by a hypercompressed schedule that forced sleepless, instantaneous decisions about the most basic political issues--scheduling, spending and, for some, quitting. A strange existential distortion had taken hold of the process. It seemed near an end without ever having crystallized. The candidates had debated ceaselessly without having a single legitimate debate, one that would have directly tested the two or three finalists. Party chair Terry McAuliffe was thrilled that the battle was nearly over. But why rush to end a good thing? The primaries have revivified the party, but the Democrats may now be left with a candidate who has not been completely vetted or honed for the fall campaign, with a party base of lemmings who never had the opportunity to consider their choices and, worst of all, with six long and empty months to fill before the public tunes in to the general election after Labor Day.
This is not to say that Kerry doesn't deserve his near nominee status. He has proved the most solid of the bunch. He kept his screeches private, even when his prospects were being ridiculed, and worked hard to overcome his inner patrician. He relearned the English language by endlessly fielding questions in town meetings. He has showed his intelligence and experience. But Kerry still has weaknesses as a candidate. His message isn't as positive or optimistic as it might be. His weathered sobriety has a dour, cautious tinge to it. He is a warrior but not a very happy one.
Kerry's best lines--his only memorable lines, in fact--have been testosterone-laden attacks on the President: "I know something about aircraft carriers for real, Mr. President" and "This Administration has run the most reckless, arrogant, inept and ideological foreign policy of modern history" and, of course, "Bring it on." The Senator doesn't do so well describing how he would clean up the mess in Iraq or at home. He has the regulation roster of plans and programs; some, like his energy-independence plan, are quite good. But he hasn't yet figured out how to explain them simply, and too often he resorts to the most ancient and threadbare Democratic nostrums: "Health care is not a privilege. It is a right" and "I will go to the United Nations ... and turn over a new page in America's relations with the world."
- 1
- 2
- NEXT PAGE »
Most Popular »
- Israel vs. Hizballah: Drumbeats of War
- Iran's Opposition Loses a Mentor But Gains a Martyr
- The Pentagon Prepares for a Missile Attack from 'Iran'
- Snow Job for the Avatar Opening?
- The Conquerors of the Tigers Now Battle for the Spoils
- The Year in Viral Videos
- Sarkozy Stands By France's Hated Immigration Minister
- U.S. Companies Shut Out as Iraq Auctions Its Oil Fields
- Did Reid Make Health Reform Tougher Than It Had to Be?
- The Danger of Doing Business in Russia
- U.S. Companies Shut Out as Iraq Auctions Its Oil Fields
- Agent Orange Poisons New Generations in Vietnam
- Autism Numbers Are Rising. The Question is Why?
- Corliss Appraises Avatar: A World of Wonder
- The Pentagon Prepares for a Missile Attack from 'Iran'
- Have Yourself a Sandinista Christmas...
- Testosterone: Not Always an Aggression Booster
- Iran's Opposition Loses a Mentor But Gains a Martyr
- Can Asia's Gambling Industry Continue to Thrive?
- Sarkozy Stands By France's Hated Immigration Minister





RSS