Curbing The Drug Marketers
(3 of 3)
Yet industry veterans argue that it would be naive to think that drug manufacturers won't continue to promote their medicines for off-label uses. Too much money is at stake. According to industry estimates, it costs around $800 million to bring a drug to market, and once the drug is approved for one use, the race is on to profit from the investment before the patent expires. Moreover, the lines between science and promotion seem to be blurring in the business of continuing medical education (CME), which is required for physician-license renewals. Between 1993 and 2001, medical-school funding for CME dropped 41%, while industry support soared 188%, now accounting for 60% of the total. Says Dr. A. Mark Fendrick, a professor of medicine at the University of Michigan: "Let's face it, industry funding is the lesser of two evils."
One consequence: conflicts of interest, according to Dr. Jerome Kassirer, a former editor of the New England Journal of Medicine and author of the forthcoming book On the Take: How Medicine's Complicity with Big Business Can Endanger Your Health. Kassirer points to a brochure, mailed to physicians last year, touting the benefits of a compound called EPO (erythropoietin) for treating anemia. Drugs containing EPO have been approved only to treat kidney disease and, in certain situations, cancer and AIDS. But after reading the brochure, he says, "only an idiot could walk away not thinking it would be useful to prescribe EPO" for off-label uses. Who funded the brochure? The National Anemia Action Council. And who funds the council? Amgen, the leading maker of EPO.
However the industry sorts out the off-label-use debate, more lawsuits (if not criminal charges) seem likely. New York attorney general Eliot Spitzer's suit against GlaxoSmithKline--for failing to widely publish negative studies of off-label uses of its antidepressant Paxil--may have opened a new legal line of attack. "You could conceive of people who weren't injured or hurt now filing suit," says Stephens, the former prosecutor. More lawsuits could also translate into higher costs for drug companies--and higher prices for drugs. And that's a headache no pill can cure. --With reporting by David Bjerklie and Julie Rawe/New York, Stefanie Friedhoff/Ann Arbor, Eric Roston/Washington and Nathan Thornburgh/Boston
- « PREV PAGE
- 1
- 2
- 3
Most Popular »
- Five Things the U.S. Can Learn from China
- China Investigates Deaths After Swine Flu Shot
- Five Things the U.S. and China Actually Agree On
- How a Bank Robber Became an Antihero in France
- Happiness Paradox: Why Are Americans So Cheery?
- Spanish Outraged by Teen Masturbation Workshops
- (Vetted) Question Time: Obama's Chinese Town Hall
- Good and Bad News for Boxing: Only One Pacquiao
- Australia Apologizes to Abused Child Migrants
- The Meaning and Mythos of Manny Pacquiao
- Five Things the U.S. Can Learn from China
- Are You Getting Scammed by Facebook Games?
- Did a Time-Traveling Bird Sabotage the Collider?
- China Investigates Deaths After Swine Flu Shot
- Happiness Paradox: Why Are Americans So Cheery?
- Five Things the U.S. and China Actually Agree On
- Spanish Outraged by Teen Masturbation Workshops
- Good and Bad News for Boxing: Only One Pacquiao
- The Meaning and Mythos of Manny Pacquiao
- Postcard from Minneapolis







RSS