|
|
- NEWSLETTERS
- MOBILE APPS
-
ADD TIME NEWS
Plenty More to Swear About
The Vulcans--a campaign 2000 nickname for George W. Bush's hawkish national security team--went Krakatoa last week. Dick Cheney erupted on the Senate floor, deploying the F word against Vermont Democrat Patrick Leahy, who had been belaboring the Vice President over the no-bid deals that Cheney's old company, Halliburton, had scored in Iraq. Deputy Defense Secretary Paul Wolfowitz suffered a meltdown in a House Armed Services Committee hearing, blasting the press for "sitting in Baghdad" and "printing rumors." (He later apologized.) And the White House was forced to acknowledge that Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld had approved, at least for a while, the use of dogs, nudity, stress positions--that is, torture--against enemy combatants. Indeed, Rumsfeld, who works at a stand-up desk, indicated a desire for at least one more strenuous stress position: "I stand 8-10 hours a day," he scrawled on a memo. "Why is standing limited to 4 hours?"
Presumably the Secretary of Defense doesn't do his standing naked, continuously, in the middle of the night, surrounded by hostile guards and attack dogs. But then, Rumsfeld's blustery testosteronics are at the heart of what has gone wrong with the Bush foreign policy--and last week the assorted temper tantrums appeared to be a leading indicator of a gathering summer storm confronting this presidency.
The torture investigation is one of four major defensive battles the Administration is facing. In the weeks to come, the White House will also have to deal with the 9/11 commission's final report, the congressional investigations into the CIA's bungled assessment of Iraq's weapons of mass destruction and a special prosecutor's hunt for the White House leakers who blew the cover of CIA secret operative Valerie Plame. Not only is the Administration defending itself against the Democrats, the investigators and the media. Two other serious, surreptitious--and quite possibly unprecedented--battles are going on: the intelligence community is at war with the White House, and the uniformed military is at war with the civilian leadership of the Pentagon. The first conflict went public last week with news of the impending publication of Imperial Hubris: Why the West Is Losing the War on Terrorism, a book by an anonymous author who is known to be a senior CIA official and former chief of the agency's Osama bin Laden station. The invasion of Iraq was "an avaricious, premeditated, unprovoked war against a foe who posed no immediate threat," the author writes. "There is nothing that bin Laden could have hoped for more than the American invasion and occupation of Iraq."
- 1
- 2
- NEXT PAGE »
Most Popular »
- Has 'Climategate' Been Overblown?
- Mexico's Witness-Protection Program: What Protection?
- Let Down by a Tiger We Never Knew
- The Growing Backlash Against Overparenting
- Why Has Taiwan's Birthrate Dropped So Low?
- How Strong Is the Evidence Against Amanda Knox?
- Time to Give Up the Ghost on bin Laden
- Can the Federal Government Really Create Jobs?
- Facebook's Secret Code
- Humanure: Goodbye, Toilets. Hello, Extreme Composting
- Has 'Climategate' Been Overblown?
- Why Has Taiwan's Birthrate Dropped So Low?
- The Job Market: Is a College Degree Worth Less?
- Parents' Sex Talk with Kids: Too Little, Too Late
- Humanure: Goodbye, Toilets. Hello, Extreme Composting
- Can the Federal Government Really Create Jobs?
- Mexico's Witness-Protection Program: What Protection?
- Max Baucus and His Women
- Let Down by a Tiger We Never Knew
- How Tiger Woods Can Survive the Scandal





RSS