Health: A Better View Of Breast Cancer
Should women at high risk for breast cancer be getting MRIs? A new Dutch study of 2,000 women showed that magnetic resonance imaging detected 80% of tumors, while mammograms found only one-third. MRIs cost a lot more, however (roughly $1,000 vs. $100), and they're not perfect. MRIs produced false alarms 10% of the time, which meant three times as many unneeded biopsies. They also missed cancers that mammography caught. Still, the case for MRIs is strong enough for the American Cancer Society to recommend that women at high risk consider having both MRIs and mammograms.
Most Popular »
- Sex, Please, We're British: London's Erotica Expo
- The Growing Backlash Against Overparenting
- Toilets
- Woman Loses Benefits over Facebook Photo
- East Antarctica, Long Stable, Is Now Losing Ice
- Talking with the Taliban: Easier Said Than Done
- Is This the End of the Line for Saab?
- Super-Crocodiles May Have Dined on Dinosaurs
- The Fall of Greg Craig, Obama's Top Lawyer
- Why Exercise Won't Make You Thin
- The Growing Backlash Against Overparenting
- Singh in Washington: Making the Case for India
- The Trouble With Abortion and Healthcare Reform
- Reburying Albert Camus: A Political Ploy by Sarkozy?
- It's Twilight in America: The Vampire Saga
- The Grass-Roots Abortion War
- The Flu Vaccine
- Q&A: Robert Pattinson
- Plagiarism Software Finds a New Shakespeare Play
- Can Vitamin D Protect Against Breast Cancer?
Quotes of the Day »
MANOJ, a police officer stationed in Mumbai, on why he and other police don't criticize their leaders for failing to meet promises to improve dire working conditions after last fall's deadly attacks on the Taj hotel







RSS