Letters: Sep. 27, 2004

• Share

(2 of 4)

IN HIS VIEWPOINT "THE CASE FOR BUSH" [Sept. 6], Charles Krauthammer argued that after the President's success in Afghanistan and a continued hunt for al-Qaeda, he could have sat back for two years and "coasted to re-election." But what about all those other issues that the Administration would have been forced to address if it hadn't been for the Iraq war? By whipping voters into a prolonged state of fear and anxiety, the President has been able to so effectively mask his abysmal performance on big problems like the economy that apparently even such savvy political essayists as Krauthammer overlook them.

ANISHA MASON San Francisco

BUSH IS DECISIVE AND BOLD, BUT THOSE traits without knowledge, sensitivity (to others and to cultural contexts) and wisdom are dangerous. We don't know yet whether Afghanistan will survive as a free and democratic country. That's still to be determined. We don't know that al-Qaeda is scattered; they are probably just lying low and planning big. Bush's shortsighted decision to invade Iraq fueled anti-Americanism not only in the Middle East but in Western democracies as well. In an ever shrinking world, the attitude of "my way or the highway" won't cut it. Looking at the real reasons behind anti-Americanism and working collaboratively with other countries facing the same threats are the only ways the war on terrorists can ever be won. But Bush doesn't have the knowledge, sensitivity or wisdom to discern that.

BARBARA J. CRAWFORD Jyvskyl, Finland

Broader Questions

THE STATE OF POLITICS IN THE U.S. TODAY is quite worrisome [Sept. 6]. Issues have been jettisoned for personal attacks that could be seen as diversionary. The war on terrorism has dominated everything, pushing aside issues like health care, jobs and education. Defending America is good, but under what circumstances? The question Americans want answered is whether they are better protected now or have been made more vulnerable to attacks. The candidates should address the host of vital issues facing Americans and reject the trivial personal smears.

COLLINS ONUOHA Berlin

IF I WERE AN AMERICAN, I WOULD VOTE for Bush. U.S. citizens should judge a President by evaluating not only what he has done in the past but also how he perceives the future. I admire a President who would oust a notorious dictator--not because voters approved of it but because it was a worthy act that benefits the world. I admire Bush.

CHINEDUM ONWUCHEKWA Nsukka, Nigeria

BUSH IS QUOTED AS SAYING "I'M NOT THE historian. I'm the guy making history." Yes, but what kind of history? Adolf Hitler and Saddam Hussein were also the guys making history. It is amazing and frightening that the head of the U.S. military is intellectually incapable of perceiving some basic distinctions. Those who want to see what kind of history Bush is making should have a look at his unmistakable cowboy posturing.

YEHIA EL-EZABI Cairo

THE PRESIDENT OF THE U.S. MUST BE strong. He is the hope not only of the U.S. but also of the world, and the global community does not need a weak leader.

MICHIO ARAI Yokohama, Japan