A New Marriage Proposal

Elsewhere in America, a family therapist, a pastor or a wise grandparent might perform Karen Faverey's job. But in Delaware Terrace, a rambling brick housing project in the Rust Belt town of Easton, Pa., Faverey, a serene mother of six, is paid by the Federal Government to enter the living rooms of unwed, low-income couples and ask a loaded question. "You know which question I'm talking about," Faverey says to Lamont Sims and Stephanie Bryant, who live and work in Delaware Terrace, he in the maintenance department, she as a receptionist. They have dated for 2 1/2 years. Sims, 31, nods. "Lately, I'm discussing it on my own, 'cause I don't know what page she's on," he says. Resting his chin in his hand, Sims turns to Bryant, 30, who cradles their infant son, Stephan, in her arms. "How," he asks, "do you feel about marriage?"

He's not the only one asking. While academics of all political stripes agree that children are better off in stable, two-parent homes, how active a role government should play in fostering marriage is a matter of debate. Faverey assists a Healthy Relationships and Marriage Education course, a pilot program funded by President Bush's Healthy Marriage Initiative. The Administration sees marriage education as a tonic for poverty and other societal problems, particularly when children are involved. In the welfare reauthorization bill now pending in the Senate, the White House has asked Congress to spend $1.5 billion on such programs--a bold request in a time of huge budget deficits, a fervid national debate over the very meaning of marriage and uncertainty over the effectiveness of marriage-education policies.

Critics worry that money spent on these programs will divert resources from other worthy antipoverty efforts such as child welfare and refugee resettlement or that marriage educators could unwittingly pressure women to stay in abusive relationships. The National Organization for Women's Legal Defense and Education Fund, recently renamed Legal Momentum, charged that the course Sims and Bryant attended specifically emphasized job services for men but mentioned nothing about finding work for mothers. "We were shocked that one of the programs being funded would reinforce existing stereotypes about men and women, advocating a passive role for women," says Jennifer Brown, Legal Momentum's vice president. "Women in poverty need their own jobs to lift their families out." The group filed a sex-discrimination complaint with the Office for Civil Rights of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).

But mainly, liberals and libertarians argue that marriage is a private decision and that, as Brown says,"There are some issues that just should not involve government." Wade Horn, Assistant Secretary for Children and Families at HHS, points out that marriages are already subject to state and federal meddling--especially when they dissolve. "You want government intrusion in family life?" Horn asks. "Get divorced. The government will tell you when you see your kid, how much you pay in child support. It can even garnishee your wages." The Healthy Marriage Initiative, Horn says, should ultimately result in less government oversight, largely because "children who grow up in healthy and stable families have less need for social services."

1. Why McCain Picked Palin
2. The Palin Pick: Bold or Disastrous?
3. McCain's Surprise Pick: Sarah Palin
4. Klein: Obama's Speech 'Very Tough'
5. McCain's Prickly TIME Interview
6. GM Recalling 944,000 Vehicles
7. Will Women Vote for Palin?
8. The Web's Word: Obama Is Not the Antichrist
9. Narrowing World Health Disparities
10. Russia 'to Absorb' South Ossetia