Letters: Apr. 3, 2000
(3 of 3)
I know who killed Kayla. It was every legislator, every proponent of guns and every citizen of the U.S. who thinks handguns are not a problem but a "right" granted by the Constitution. Blame also falls on those who will not support the gun-control legislation that would prevent these tragedies. MARTIN ANTHONY Malvern, Pa.
How is it that the absent parents of the child who shot Kayla are irrelevant and gun legislation is relevant? Why not require parenting classes and forbid procreation without a background check, waiting period and license? This legislation, as absurd as it sounds, would have been more beneficial to Kayla. JOSEPH L. GREENE Canyon Country, Calif.
A Powerful Mouth
Every time Fed Chairman Alan Greenspan opens his mouth the stock market gyrates, making an already volatile market even more so [BUSINESS, March 13]. I think Congress should pass a law forbidding the chairman of the Federal Reserve Board to comment on stock prices with the chance of influencing the market direction. We should let the free-market economy be free of manipulation by powerful people inside and outside the government. SHALINI MOONDRA Marlboro, N.J.
When will Greenspan wake up? The Fed has been blindsided by the phenomenal increase in stock-market valuations. It responds with anemic interest-rate increases designed to cool expansion and control nonexistent inflation-this despite a fundamentally healthy economy. Clearly Greenspan's Fed is suffering from its own brand of irrational exuberance. The rate increases and threats of what might happen punish traditional investors, while the wild speculation Greenspan seems preoccupied with taming laughs in his face. PETER L. ROGERS Darien, Conn.
Rights for All Animals
It's sad to note that attorney Steven Wise, the self-proclaimed champion of animal rights [AMERICAN SCENE, March 13], does not defend the rights of all animals. Instead, Wise has created his own non-Darwinian continuum to argue for legal rights for only certain animals--the more a species is like humans, the more deserving it is of legal rights. Yet there is a danger in this approach. For it means the less like us, the less likely that legal rights would be granted. We don't live in an "us vs. them" world. We live in a world of "us and them." We must protect our differences, not just our sameness. BOB ORABONA, OPERATIONS DIRECTOR Friends of Animals Darien, Conn.
- « PREV PAGE
- 1
- 2
- 3
Most Popular »
- How Cash Keeps Poor People Poor
- E.T. Turns 30: 10 Things You Didn't Know About Our Favorite Extraterrestrial
- No Spontanaeity Allowed: How to Visit North Korea as a Tourist in Four (Restrictive) Steps
- 15-Year-Old Creates Test for Pancreatic Cancer
- Fourth Flesh-Eating-Bacteria Case Confirmed in Georgia, Possible Fifth
- A New First Amendment Right: Videotaping The Police
- Nevada Ghosts: Rare Photos From an A-Bomb Test
- 10 Dangerous Products You Might Have in Your Home
- Euro Crisis: Why A Greek Exit Could Be Much Worse Than Expected
- Could a Fertility Gene Discovery Lead to New Male Contraception?
- Researchers Probe the Potential Health Benefits of Palm Oil
- A Visit with Turkey's Controversial Religious Movement
- Feeding the Planet Without Destroying It
- Bubble on the Potomac
- Falcon's Liftoff: How a Private Firm Could Change Space Exploration
- The Fatal Flight of the Superjet 100: Why Did It Slam Into a Mountain?
- Learning That Works
- The Man Who Remade Motherhood
- Bibi's Choice
- Seoul: 10 Things to Do




