It's the Security, Stupid
If you follow politics at all or even if you don't you're soon going to get tired of one word this fall: security. As far as both parties in Washington are concerned, security is what everyone is looking for, so any issue you care about ahead of the November election is going to be packaged as a "security" issue. Worried about flat wages or higher taxes? Republicans and Democrats alike want to talk to you about "economic security." Angry about Bush's handling of the war in Iraq or weak-kneed Democrats getting in the way of his domestic surveillance programs? Both sides have a message about national security for you.
And so, inevitably, the furious immigration debate of last spring, which for a moment was about reforming a system everyone agrees is broken, has been boiled down to the issue of "border security." Most Republicans have concluded that a hard-line approach focused on tightening the U.S.-Mexico border is the best political play this season. Neither the broad package of reforms negotiated by the Senate, which would have produced a guest worker program and a path to citizenship for the 12 million illegal immigrants now in the country, nor the more limited program envisioned by House conservative leader Mike Pence has any momentum. Both proposals have been set aside in favor of a series of bills already making their way through the system that will fund fences, border guards and electronic surveillance.
Behind the move is another security issue: job security for incumbents on the Hill. Conservative voters are furious about the porous U.S.-Mexico border. And the fears that an enraged Hispanic population would punish the GOP for taking what some called anti-Hispanic positions on tightening border enforcement are long gone. "We haven't seen any empirical support for that," says one senior GOP aide. The aide points to close races around the country where Democrats are falling into line behind a border-security-first approach, and a recent AP survey that showed no significant new voter registration in cities where pro-immigration rallies had taken place.
Some in the GOP are not happy. "Border security is not the end of the story," says Mississippi Senator Trent Lott. "Most people in the country are still concerned and think we should act on [immigration reform], and it contributes to the impression that we're not doing our job. We need to do more than just provide funds for fencing." But if anyone does bring up other parts of the debate between now and November, you know how they're going to get handled. Senate majority leader Bill Frist was asked on Wednesday if he would support more programs to check the legal status of laborers at work sites. Without hesitation he said he would support such "verification at the workplace in terms of border security."
Most Popular »
- Your Turn, Canada: A Second-By-Second Look at Jeremy Lin Lighting Up Toronto
- Love Ever After: A Valentine’s Day Special
- Can Jeremy Lin End The MSG/Time Warner Cable War?
- Linsanity Heads East, Linfects China and Taiwan
- After Whitney Houston, Musicians Say: I'm Afraid
- Move Over, Pajama Jeans: Dress-Pant Sweatpants Have Arrived
- Music: White Lies and The White Stripes
- Top 10 Famous Love Letters
- Rick Santorum Wants to Fight 'The Dangers Of Contraception'
- Roving the Red Planet
- Europe's Deep Freeze: Why Climate Change Is Not (Entirely) to Blame
- Study: Lead Poisoning Could Lurk in Spices
- In Venezuela, Finally a Credible Opposition Candidate to Face Hugo Chávez?
- Why Legalizing Marijuana Makes Sense
- A New Recovery Center for the Woes of Warcraft
- Mother Teresa's Crisis of Faith
- Phyllis Schlafly at 84
- In Thailand, Iranian Suspected in Bomb Blasts
- Romney's Cruel Canine Vacation
- Burning Desire For Freedom





