Who Cares About the Bush 9/11 Photo?
A photo of Bush from Sept. 11 has sparked criticism of GOP fundraising tactics
The Republican National Committee is selling three photographs of President Bush, including one taken hours after the September 11 terror attacks, to donors for $150. Top Democrats are outraged outraged, I tell you! at the audacity of the RNC move. The White House, meanwhile, defends the use of the photos. Why anyone should care is a mystery.
The chattering class is abuzz over Photogate. Whether excoriating the White House for "using that dark and sacred day to divide and conquer" (Maureen Dowd) or cheerfully reporting fund-raising success with studied disregard for any negative implications (the Washington Times headline was "Bush Helps Raise $30 Million for RNC"), members of the media are having an awfully good time thumbing noses either at the White House or at each other. And the other 99.99 percent of Americans? How do they feel about this political fracas?
If the rest of America is anything like me, they're reading the newspapers and wondering what they missed. I spent much of the morning trying to extract some seed of outrage from the myriad breathless news reports detailing the fundraising potential of these photographs. After an hour or so, I gave up.
This is not news, folks. This is pure, frothy, self-righteous politics and we really should do a better job of separating the two. The RNC decided to present three photographs of "defining moments" in the Bush presidency. Obviously, as it defined so many things for most of us, the events of September 11th serve as a natural backdrop for one of those images. As much as the Democrats may want to forget, President Bush was the guy in charge of the country that day, and while his reaction to the attacks is no more or less real or valuable than that of any other American, he faced far more pressure, threats to his personal safety than most of us faced that day.
The most iconic presidential photographs are both profoundly personal and indelibly historic. They belong, all at once, to the subject, the photographer and the public. Think of JFK stooped, exhausted over his desk in the Oval Office during the Cuban Missile Crisis, or of a disgraced Richard Nixon waving, both hands raised, boarding the plane that final day. Did Democrats capitalize on images of Nixon's impeachment? Of course. Did Republicans publicly question Kennedy's maturity and ability to handle the Soviet threat? Absolutely.
As much as the Dems are loath to admit it, political photographs are fair game for anyone who wants to use them, and this time around, the Republicans happen to have dibs on the hot seller.
Most Popular »
- E.T. Turns 30: 10 Things You Didn't Know About Our Favorite Extra-Terrestrial
- Nevada Ghosts: Rare Photos From an A-Bomb Test
- Temple of Doom: Scientists Discover Peruvian Tomb Filled with Mummies, Infants
- 15-Year-Old Creates Test for Pancreatic Cancer
- Before and After D-Day: Rare Color Photos
- A Diamond Jubilee
- 10 Dangerous Products You Might Have in Your Home
- Marilyn Monroe: Early Unpublished Photos
- Obama Stumbles? Why the President's Right to Talk About Bain
- Buffett's New Message: Damn the Deal, Keep Work and Life in Balance
- Researchers Probe the Potential Health Benefits of Palm Oil
- A Visit with Turkey's Controversial Religious Movement
- Feeding the Planet Without Destroying It
- Bubble on the Potomac
- Falcon's Liftoff: How a Private Firm Could Change Space Exploration
- The Fatal Flight of the Superjet 100: Why Did It Slam Into a Mountain?
- Learning That Works
- The Man Who Remade Motherhood
- Bibi's Choice
- Seoul: 10 Things to Do




