spacer gif
blank
TIMEpacific

Search TIMEpacific.com
 


TIME Pacific Home
From TIME Pacific
Magazine Archive
Web Features
Photo Essays

Subscribe to TIME
Customer Service
About Us
Press Release
Write to TIME Pacific


TIME.com
TIME Asia
TIME Canada
TIME Europe
TIME Pacific
ON
Asiaweek
Latest CNN News

sydfest

 

 

 




spacer gif
spacer gif
Magazine

TIME PACIFIC
November 6, 2000 | NO. 44

Should You Stay Together for the Kids?
PAGE 1 | 2 | 3 | 4

What drew someone from such a stable background to the study of marital distress? At the end of the 1960s, Wallerstein, whose Ph.D. is in clinical psychology, moved from Topeka, Kans. to swinging California. "Divorce was almost unheard of in the Midwest," she recalls. Not so on the West Coast: the state had just passed its pioneering no-fault divorce law. Wallerstein took a job consulting at a large community mental-health center in Marin County just as the social dam began to crack. "We started to get complaints," she says, "from nursery school teachers and parents: ŒOur children are having a very hard time. What should we do?'"

The prevailing view at the time, she says, was that divorce was no big deal for kids. So much for the power of positive thinking. "We began to get all these questions," Wallerstein remembers. "The children were sleepless. The children in the nursery school were aggressive. They were out of control." When Wallerstein hit the library for answers, she discovered there were none. The research hardly existed, so she decided to do her own. She had a hunch about what she would learn. "I saw a lot of children very upset," she says, "but I fully expected that it would be fleeting."

Her hunch was wrong. Paradise for kids from ruptured families wasn't easily regained. Once cast out of the domestic garden, kids dreamed of getting back in. The result more often than not was frustration and anxiety. Children of divorce suffer depression, learning difficulties and other psychological problems more frequently than those of intact families. Some of Wallerstein's colleagues, not to mention countless divorced parents, felt they were being guilt-tripped by a traditionalist. They didn't want to hear this somber news.

Now, decades later, some still don't want to hear her. For parents, her book's chief finding, to be sure, is hardly upbeat or very reassuring: children take a long time to get over divorce. Indeed, its most harmful and profound effects tend to show up as the children reach maturity and struggle to form their own adult relationships. They're gun-shy. The slightest conflict sends them running. Expecting disaster, they create disaster. "They look for love in strange places," Wallerstein says. "They make terrible errors of judgment in whom they choose."

Leanne Port, 43, a Sydney mother and student whose parents separated when she was 12, says she has little memory of the trauma. But as a young woman, she couldn't seem to stick with the same boyfriend. "My father was a party boy and I took after him," she says: "I learned to pick guys up and dump them as easily as men could [with women]." She's since acquired a taste for commitment. Married now for 11 years, her feelings about divorce are unequivocal: "I see my marriage as together, forever. I would never leave my husband."

Ella Asher, 17, is also prepared to play the field-until the right man comes along. A Sydney high school student, she was nine when her father left. Asher admits to having a "phobia of commitment because I don't want to end up like my parents." But she's "determined to get married when I meet the right guy and make it work. I wouldn't consider divorce as an option."

And therein lies another problem, according to Wallerstein: the belief, quite common in children of divorce, that marriage is either a fairy tale or nothing. These jittery, idealistic children tend to hold out for the perfect mate-only to find they have a very long wait. Worse, once they're convinced they've found him, they're often let down. High romantic expectations tend to give way, Wallerstein reports, to bitter disillusionments. Children from broken families tend to marry later, yet divorce more often than those from intact homes.>>MORE

PAGE 1 | 2 | 3 | 4


 

Copyright © 2001 Time Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.
E-mail us:  Letter to the Editor | Customer Service Privacy Policy

 




More Stories

November 6, 2000 | NO. 44

SOCIETY AND SCIENCE
COVER : Is Divorce Bad for Kids?
A controversial book argues that the damage caused when parents split is graver than suspected. Should unhappy adults stay together for their kids' sake?

Viewpoint: Katha Pollitt on divorce's bum rap

SOUTH PACIFIC
AUSTRALIA: Trials of the Regiment
The armed forces have fine policies on violence and sexual equity, but have they the will to implement those rules?

T H E   A R T S
FESTIVALS: The Pacific is rediscovered in New Caledonia

CINEMA: Omar Epps hopes Love & Basketball is a slam dunk

BOOKS: Steve Martin gets serious in his novella Shopgirl
Margaret Atwood's sinuous tapestry of family secrets
A Ugandan novelist's haunting look at his homeland

TRAVELER'S ADVISORY