
A Global Green Deal

By
Mark Hertsgaard
So
what do we do? everyone knows the planet is in bad shape, but most
people are resigned to passivity. Changing course, they reason,
would require economic sacrifice and provoke stiff resistance from
corporations and consumers alike, so why bother? It's easier to
ignore the gathering storm clouds and hope the problem magically
takes care of itself.
Such fatalism
is not only dangerous but mistaken. For much of the 1990s I traveled
the world to write a book about our environmental predicament. I
returned home sobered by the extent of the damage we are causing
and by the speed at which it is occurring. But there is nothing
inevitable about our self-destructive behavior. Not only could we
dramatically reduce our burden on the air, water and other natural
systems, we could make money doing so. If we're smart, we could
make restoring the environment the biggest economic enterprise of
our time, a huge source of jobs, profits and poverty alleviation.
What we need is
a Global Green Deal: a program to renovate our civilization environmentally
from top to bottom in rich and poor countries alike. Making use
of both market incentives and government leadership, a 21st century
Global Green Deal would do for environmental technologies what government
and industry have recently done so well for computer and Internet
technologies: launch their commercial takeoff.
Getting it done
will take work, and before we begin we need to understand three
facts about the reality facing us. First, we have no time to lose.
While we've made progress in certain areasÑair pollution is down
in the U.S.Ñbig environmental problems like climate change, water
scarcity and species extinction are getting worse, and faster than
ever. Thus we have to change our ways profoundlyand very soon.
Second, poverty
is central to the problem. Four billion of the planet's 6 billion
people face deprivation inconceivable to the wealthiest 1 billion.
To paraphrase Thomas Jefferson, nothing is more certainly written
in the book of fate than that the bottom two-thirds of humanity
will strive to improve their lot. As they demand adequate heat and
food, not to mention cars and CD players, humanity's environmental
footprint will grow. Our challenge is to accommodate this mass ascent
from poverty without wrecking the natural systems that make life
possible.

1 | 2
| 3
|