Even now, however, Ernest and his colleagues cannot be certain
they are on the right track. Too many promising treatments for
macular degeneration, they caution, have failed to produce
discernible benefits. But if they--and other researchers around
the world--are on to something basic, then eventually
ophthalmologists will be able to help their patients, perhaps
not to cure macular degeneration (that would be too much to hope
for), but at least to stop its relentless progression.
To be sure, macular degeneration, which currently affects an
estimated 10 million Americans, is not a fatal disorder. But it
can be cruelly debilitating. For while the macula (named after
the Latin word for spot) is no wider than a pencil, it is a
hundred times more sensitive to small-scale features than the
rest of the retina. Without a healthy macula, people cannot read
a newspaper, recognize a friend, thread a needle, watch TV,
safely negotiate stairs or see much of anything at all.
Until now, physicians have been able to offer only palliative
care to patients with macular degeneration: more powerful
eyeglasses; visual aids, such as machines that enlarge print;
and, for a minority of cases--those that involve the invasive
growth of blood vessels--laser therapy that sometimes slows down
the disease, at least for a time. But only 10% of those in whom
macular degeneration is diagnosed develop this more rapidly
progressing, invasive form of the disease. For them, experts
agree, intervention is needed earlier, before so much visual
acuity is lost.
Macular degeneration is devastating because it kills off a small
but critical patch of light-sensing cells that line the retina
like the film in a camera. Known as rods and cones because of
their telltale shapes, these cells record visual images as
patterns of illumination and shadow, and relay that information,
as electrical impulses, through the optic nerve to the brain. It
is not that people with macular degeneration become completely
blind; peripheral vision, which is handled by other areas of the
retina, remains unaffected by the disease. But as damage to the
macula builds up--probably a consequence of chemical damage that
accumulates over a lifetime--central vision fades, and the
external world dissolves into an indistinct blur.
| Page 1 | Page 2 | Page 3 |Page 4 |
|