Will Malthus Be Right?
His forecast was ahead of its time, but nature may still
put a lid on humanity
by NILES ELDREDGE
Malthus was right. So read a car bumper sticker on a busy New
Jersey highway the other day, and it got me thinking about the
Rev. Thomas Malthus, the English political economist who gave
the "dismal science" its nickname. His "Essay on the Principle
of Population," published in 1798, predicted a gloomy future for
humanity: our population would grow until it reached the limits
of our food supply, ensuring that poverty and famine would
persistently rear their ugly faces to the world.
The most casual cruise on the Internet shows how much debate
Malthus still stirs today. Basically, the Pollyannas of this
world say that Malthus was wrong; the population has continued to
grow, economies remain robust - and famines in Biafra and Ethiopia
are more aberrations than signs of the future. Cassandras reply
that Malthus was right, but techno-fixes have postponed the day
of reckoning. There are now 6 billion people on Earth. The
Pollyannas say the more the merrier; the Cassandras say that is
already twice as many as can be supported in middle-class
comfort, and the world is running out of arable land and fresh
water. Despite a recent slowdown in the growth rate, the U.N.
Population Division expects the world population to reach 9.5
billion by the year 2100.
What's missing from the debate is an understanding of the
changing relationship between humanity and nature. For it is how
humans fit into the natural world that will settle whether
Malthus was right or wrong. He was wrong in 1798. But if he had
been writing 10,000 years earlier, before agriculture, he would
have been right. And were his book being published today, on the
brink of the third millennium, he would be more right than wrong.
Let me explain.
Malthus cared about only one species: ours. And, ecologically
speaking, ours is an unusual species. With the invention of
agriculture 10,000 years ago, we became the first species in the
3.7 billion-year history of life not to be living as small
populations off the natural fat of the land. Taking food
production into our own hands, we stepped outside the local
ecosystem. All but a few cultivated plants became weeds, and all
but a few domesticated herds, pets and game animals became pests
and vermin.
MORE>>
PAGE 1 | 2 | 3
|