We share this interest in infertile, social sex with a few other
species: dolphins, bonobo apes and some birds. But even if sex
is too good for human beings to give up, more and more people
will abandon it as a means of reproduction. Many people born
from in-vitro techniques are themselves infertile--they inherit
the infertility from their genetic parents. So infertility is
bound to increase, and with it the demand for IVF. Add to this
the demand from gay men and women and from those with private
eugenic motives - ranging from not wanting to pass on inherited
disease to wanting taller or smarter or prettier children - and
sexless reproduction is bound to spread.
In the modern world, you can even have sex and parenthood
without suffering the bit in between. Some Hollywood actresses
may have satisfied the urge for mothering by electing to adopt
children rather than spoil their figures (as they see it) by
childbearing. For people as beautiful as this, the temptation to
adopt a clone (reared in a surrogate womb) could one day be
irresistible.
Once cloning loses its stigma, the urge to tinker with the genes
of offspring may not be far behind. As Cambridge molecular
biologist Graeme Mitchison says, "We can all be beautiful--no
baldness, no wimps with glasses, no knobby knees." Olivia
Judson, author of a forthcoming book called Dr. Tatiana's Sex
Advice for All Creation, begs to differ: "If there is such
hostility to genetically modified soya, it doesn't bode well for
genetically modified people."
Human cloning and designer babies are probably not imminent.
Even assuming that the procedures are judged safe and efficient
in farm animals, still a long way off, they will be heavily
discouraged, if not banned, by many governments for human beings.
It is worth noting, however, that in much of the biological
world, cloning is old hat. There are some species, such as those
dandelions and whiptail lizards, that reproduce no other way,
and there are many, such as aphids and strawberries, that switch
effortlessly between sex and cloning. There are fierce arguments
in biological circles about why such species have not taken over
the world: since they reproduce so efficiently and do not waste
energy producing futile creatures called males.
MORE>>
PAGE 1 | 2 | 3