PAGE 1 | 2 | 3
What about sex, though, meaning the experience, not the category?
Chances are, we will be having sex with machines, mostly
computers. Even today you can buy interactive cd-roms like
Virtual Valerie, and there's talk of full-body, virtual-reality
sex in which the pleasure seeker wears a specially fitted
suit--very specially fitted--allowing for tactile as well as
audiovisual sensation. If that sounds farfetched, consider the
fact that cyber-innovation is currently in the hands of social
skills-challenged geeks who couldn't hope to get a date without
flashing their Internet stock options.
Still, there's a reason why the Big Divorce scenario isn't likely
to work out, even by Y3K: we love each other, we males and
females--madly, sporadically, intermittently, to be sure--but at
least enough to keep us pair bonding furiously, even when there's
no obvious hardheaded reason to do so. Hence, despite predictions
of the imminent "breakdown of the family," the divorce rate
leveled off in the 1990s, and the average couple is still hopeful
or deluded enough to invest about $20,000 in their first wedding.
True, fewer people are marrying: 88% of Americans have married at
least once, down from 94% in 1988. But the difference is largely
made up by couples who set up housekeeping without the blessing
of the state. And an astounding 16% of the population has been
married three times--which shows a remarkable commitment to, if
nothing else, the institution of marriage.
The question for the new century is, Do we love each other
enough--enough, that is, to sustain the old pair-bonded way of
life? Many experts see the glass half empty: cohabitation may be
replacing marriage, but it's even less likely to last. Hearts are
routinely broken and children's lives disrupted as we churn, ever
starry-eyed, from one relationship to the next. Even liberal
icons like Hillary Rodham Clinton and Harvard Afro-American
studies professor Cornel West have been heard muttering about the
need to limit the ease and accessibility of divorce.
Hence, perhaps, Scenario B: seeing that the old economic and
biological pressures to marry don't work anymore, people will
decide to replace them with new forms of coercion. Divorce will
be outlawed, along with abortion and possibly contraception.
Extramarital hanky-panky will be punishable with shunning or, in
the more hard-line jurisdictions, stoning. There will still be
sex, and probably plenty of it inside marriage, thanks to what
will be known as Chemically Assisted Monogamy: Viagra for men and
Viagra-like drugs for women, such as apomorphine and Estratest
(both are being tested right now), to reignite the spark long
after familiarity has threatened to extinguish it. Naturally,
prescriptions will be available only upon presentation of a valid
marriage license.
It couldn't happen here, even in a thousand years? Already, a
growing "marriage movement," including groups like the Promise
Keepers, is working to make divorce lawyers as rare as elevator
operators. Since 1997, Louisiana and Arizona have been offering
ultratight "covenant marriages," which can be dissolved only in
the case of infidelity, abuse or felony conviction, and similar
measures have been introduced in 17 other states. As for the
age-old problem of premarital fooling around, some extremely
conservative Christian activists have launched a movement to halt
the dangerous practice of dating and replace it with
parent-supervised betrothals leading swiftly and ineluctably to
the altar.
PAGE 1 | 2 | 3