• v21 home
  • live events
  • bulletin boards
  • caleb carr
    mystery



Many scientists believe biotech could raise overall crop productivity in developing countries as much as 25% and help prevent the loss of those crops after they are harvested.

Yet for all that promise, biotech is far from being the whole answer. In developing countries, lost crops are only one cause of hunger. Poverty plays the largest role. Today more than 1 billion people around the globe live on less than $1 a day. Making genetically modified crops available will not reduce hunger if farmers cannot afford to grow them or if the local population cannot afford to buy the food those farmers produce.

Nor can biotech overcome the challenge of distributing food in developing countries. Taken as a whole, the world produces enough food to feed everyone—but much of it is simply in the wrong place. Especially in countries with undeveloped transport infrastructures, geography restricts food availability as dramatically as genetics promises to improve it.

Biotech has its own "distribution" problems. Private-sector biotech companies in the rich countries carry out much of the leading-edge research on genetically modified crops. Their products are often too costly for poor farmers in the developing world, and many of those products won't even reach the regions where they are most needed. Biotech firms have a strong financial incentive to target rich markets first in order to help them rapidly recoup the high costs of product development. But some of these companies are responding to the needs of poor countries. A London-based company, for example, has announced that it will share with developing countries technology needed to produce vitamin-enriched "golden rice."

More and more biotech research is being carried out in developing countries. But to increase the impact of genetic research on the food production of those countries, there is a need for better collaboration between government agencies—both local and in developed countries—and private biotech firms. The isaaa, for example, is successfully partnering with the U.S. Agency for International Development, local researchers and private biotech companies to find and deliver biotech solutions for farmers in developing countries.

Will "Frankenfoods" feed the world? Biotech is not a panacea, but it does promise to transform agriculture in many developing countries. If that promise is not fulfilled, the real losers will be their people, who could suffer for years to come.

PAGE  1  |  2


PRIVACY POLICY






Back to Question Page

Bill Gates: Will Frankenfood Feed the World?

Will We Still Drive Our Cars (Or Will Our Cars Drive Us)?

Bruce Sterling: Will Cybercriminals Run the World?

Will Cybersex Be Better Than Real Sex?

Will We Still Turn Pages?

Will Smell-O-Vision Replace Television?

Will I Still Be Addicted To Video Games?

Will My PC Be Smarter Than I Am?

William Gibson: Will We Plug Chips into Our Brains?

Will Robots Rise Up and Demand Their Rights?

Will Everything Be Digital?

Will Tiny Robots Build Diamonds One Atom At A Time?

What Will Replace Silicon?

What Will Replace The Internet?

Will AOL Own Everything?

Is Technology Moving Too Fast?

Will Low Tech Replace High Tech?