Click here to visit our advertiser.
  • v21 home
  • live events
  • bulletin boards
  • caleb carr
    mystery


How Will We Fight?
War won't get any less lethal in the next century, says the general who led the fight in Kosovo. And our battles will become even more complex

By General Wesley Clark

Throughout history, the world's military have prepared for the next war guided by how the last war was fought. In the face of exploding technological advances in weaponry and communications, shifting international political and economic power, and the rise of challenges such as terrorism and international crime, is the last war a true guide or a risky diversion?

As NATO aircraft lit the sky over Yugoslavia at the start of Operation Allied Force last year, NATO's political leaders were issuing press announcements stating that "NATO is not at war with Yugoslavia." Tell that to the pilots who flew night and day against the missiles and antiaircraft fire over Serbia and who saw the effects of the ethnic cleansing on the ground!

Operation Allied Force was a campaign extending over 78 days and involving more than 900 aircraft, hundreds of cruise missiles, four aircraft carriers and more than a dozen other surface ships and submarines. Their mission was to use air power to halt or diminish a systematic campaign of ethnic cleansing being carried out by more than 50,000 Serb military, police and paramilitary against 1 1/2 million virtually defenseless ethnic Albanians. More than 250 fixed targets were attacked, including airfields, communications, fuel depots, and military and police headquarters. More than 1,000 strikes were conducted against enemy forces in Kosovo.

But it was not officially a war. Many peacetime legal and political restrictions remained in effect. Governments strictly limited the pace of the action, the types of weapons that could be used and the targets that could be struck. The targets attacked were often in the midst of civilians, some of whom were the very people we were trying to help. We looked at each target very carefully before we struck, and we used precision weapons—laser-, gps- or TV-guided bombs and missiles—as often as possible to limit risks to innocent civilians.

We reduced the risks to our own pilots by using high-technology aircraft, including the Stealth bomber, and unmanned aerial vehicles, along with other means to frustrate the enemy's air defenses. Video-teleconferencing and virtual-intelligence centers created by using a secret, high-capacity Internet helped keep up with the detailed top-down guidance and changing politics directed by an alliance of 19 sovereign states—all as the world's media looked on. After 78 days, the opposing leader gave in to NATO's demands, without a single NATO ground soldier having to fight his way into Serbia.

Is this the future of warfare? Not necessarily. But many features of this conflict will reappear. Operation Allied Force was one step in the continuing evolution of conflict. A look at the pattern of this evolution shows what the future may have in store.

MORE >>

PAGE  1 | 2 | 3 







SIDEBAR:What Are the Weapons of the Future?

Back to Question Page

Will Service Still Stink?

What Will Our Offices Look Like?

How Will Advertisers Reach Us?

How Will We Fight?

Will Socialism Make A Comeback?

Will the Dow Ever Hit 50,000?

Who Will Top the Fortune 500?

What Will We Do for Work?

What Will Be the 10 Hottest Jobs?

What Will Replace the Tech Economy?

Will There Be Any Hope For the Poor?

Will Everyone Have the Bomb?

Will China Be Number One?

What Will Peace Mean For the Middle East?

Will You Become Your Own Nation?

Are We Coming Apart or Together?