
Substance: B+
Style: A-
Offense: B+
Defense: B
Overall grade: A-
Tenaciously drove his four core issues (change, unity, inspiration, problem solving), and incorporated them into almost every answer. Wisely did not revel in his palpable popularity with the theater's liberal audience, lest he appear ungallant (yet again). Managed to project natural confidence without veering into smug conceit. Seemed far less intimidated by Clinton than in past debates, reflecting what friends say is a growing assurance that he will and should win the nomination and the presidency. Bottom line: Contributed to the dignified tone and frictionless flow that discouraged media melodrama and headlines beyond the much-discussed historical nature of the event itself, and proved himself able to face his fellow frontrunner and make his case for the job.
As a testament to his suddenly strong position in the battle for the GOP nomination, says Mark Halperin, the Senator showed off all of his worst traits -- and still easily beat back Mitt Romney's desperate efforts to knock him off his perch
Mitt has a moment -- just when he needed one. But for the rest of the field, it was a snooze-fest of missed opportunities
Analysis: Any dreams of a Clinton-Obama ticket were probably ended after their testiest encounter yet. Mark Halperin gives Obama the edge
John McCain acted the confident frontrunner, Mike Huckabee was the regular guy, and Fred Thompson played attack dog. Mark Halperin scores the South Carolina debate
Mark Halperin grades the candidates in their last joint appearance
The tone was upbeat, the sparks few in the last Democratic encounter before Super Tuesday. Mark Halperin reviews both performances
Asian Film Fireworks for the Fourth
Ask Your Questions: The New York Times' Bill Keller
Cartoons of the Week