
A deeply flawed performancebut good enough to continue his forceful push towards the nomination.
Substance: Did not attempt to demonstrate more specifics than in past debatesand clearly didn't think he had to. Threw out bromides-masquerading-as-policy on college costs and health care, but little else.
Grade: C+
Style: Brilliantly and poetically played the Democrats-all-agree-on-so-many-things card that Clinton regularly used when she was ahead. Also adopted her crowd-pleasing brand of anti-Bush rhetoric. Occasionally let her get under his skin just a tad, and sometimes flashed a bit of annoyanceperhaps making him seem ungracious.
Grade: B
Offense: Tweaked her just enough on her vulnerabilities (divisive image, failed health care effort in the early '90s, Iraq war) to keep her off balance.
Grade: A
Defense: Got the crowd on his side with his pushbacks on talk-versus-action and plagiarism chargeswas calm and stylish and firm, if a bit chilly. Filibustered regularly, as if to run out the clock.
Grade: A-
OVERALL GRADE: B+
by Mark HalperinThe tone was upbeat, the sparks few in the last Democratic encounter before Super Tuesday. Mark Halperin reviews both performances
As a testament to his suddenly strong position in the battle for the GOP nomination, says Mark Halperin, the Senator showed off all of his worst traits -- and still easily beat back Mitt Romney's desperate efforts to knock him off his perch
Mitt has a moment -- just when he needed one. But for the rest of the field, it was a snooze-fest of missed opportunities
Analysis: Any dreams of a Clinton-Obama ticket were probably ended after their testiest encounter yet. Mark Halperin gives Obama the edge
John McCain acted the confident frontrunner, Mike Huckabee was the regular guy, and Fred Thompson played attack dog. Mark Halperin scores the South Carolina debate
Mark Halperin grades the candidates in their last joint appearance