Four Enduring Myths About Supreme Court Nominees
In anticipation of the upcoming Supreme Court hearings, a few of those anesthetizing myths about the high court are now ready for debunking.
In the short term, for this reason, it is unlikely that Obama's choice will move the court's ideological needle. But over the longer run, his pick could matter a great deal. If recent history is any guide, Obama's nominee will serve on the court for 20 years or more and thus outlast most of the other Justices. A pick who might seem relatively unimportant at the outset (like President Nixon's selection of William Rehnquist) might well become very important and influential over time, even becoming the Chief Justice, as Rehnquist did. A long run by a now young appointee could be especially pivotal on a court like the current one, where the ideological split is 5-4 on almost every controversial issue.
In sum, no matter what tales we tell ourselves, we will not be able to escape the inconvenient truths that judicial politics is hugely divisive, hugely important and, at the moment, tragically predictable, as our Supreme Court will continue to mirror our most divided selves.
View the full list for "Four Enduring Myths About Supreme Court Nominees"Latest Lists
Around the Web
-
Anne Burrell Comes Out: Food Network Star Confirms She's A Lesbian
From THE HUFFINGTON POST
-
John Edwards Trial Juror Flirting With Ex-Senator
From THE HUFFINGTON POST
-
Tide Redesigning Box After Kids Mistake Detergent For Candy
From SLATE
-
Islamist Leader Likely To Face Former PM in Egyptian Runoff
From SLATE










