|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Peter Singer | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Deep Ideas About Life By ARTHUR CAPLAN
His seminal book, Animal Liberation, appeared a year later. It laid out a careful argument for giving moral standing to animals on the basis of their capacity to suffer. It galvanized movements around the world to restrict animal research and abolish factory farming. It also set off passionate debates that are reflected today in arguments about the morality of third-trimester abortions, stem-cell research and the removal of feeding tubes from people in permanent vegetative states. It is easy to demonize Singer, 58, since his theory points toward conclusions that some find morally repugnantfor example, that euthanasia might be the appropriate response to the intractable suffering of an infant born with a terrible genetic malady. Those who scorn his views can rarely produce an argument about why he is wrongthey simply don't like his conclusions. But ethics is all about arguments, not moral pronouncements. I don't always agree with Peter. But he is a man whose reasoning merits consideration by everyone. There are few philosophers, living or dead, about whom that can be said.
Caplan is director of the Center for Bioethics at the University of Pennsylvania
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
FROM THE APRIL 18, 2005 ISSUE OF TIME MAGAZINE; POSTED SUNDAY, APRIL 10, 2005
Copyright © 2005 Time Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited. Subscribe | Customer Service | Help | Site Map | Search | Contact Us Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Reprints & Permissions | Press Releases | Media Kit |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||