L o v e , S e x & H e a l t h
The Marriage Savers
Does couples therapy really work? The divorce rate says no, but a new breed of therapists offers hope
By Richard Corliss and Sonja Steptoe
January 19, 2004
Health
The cynic Ambrose Bierce defined love as "a temporary insanity,
curable by marriage." It's truer to say the first blush of love
is a vacation from reality; marriage is the job you return to.
You may like your job, even love it. But you have to work to keep
it.
In modern America, there's no shortage of professionals ready
and willing to pitch in with the task. In fact, over the past
40 years, the couples-counseling business has exploded. In 1966
there were only about 1,800 experts practicing in the field,
according to the Department of Health and Human Services. In
2001 the American Association for Marriage and Family Therapy
listed 47,111 marriage and family therapists in the U.S. and
estimated that they treat 863,700 couples a year.
Yet how many were helped? The growth of the marriage-industrial
complex has not done much to slow the national divorce epidemic.
In 1965 the divorce rate was 2.5 per 1,000 people; it reached a
high in 1979 and 1981, with 5.3 per 1,000. Today the figure
hovers at about 4.0, pretty much where it has been for five
years. In some quarters, the suspicion has lingered that the
therapist's job is to validate a patient's complaints and act as
ministers in reverse, putting couples asunder. "The idea of
therapist neutrality often came down to support for breaking up,"
says William Doherty, director of the Marriage and Family Therapy
Program at the University of Minnesota. And therapists weren't
appreciated for it. In a 1995 Consumer Reports poll, couples
seeking therapy gave marriage counselors low grades for
competence.
Lately, however, a new breed of therapist and "marriage educator"
is shaking up the profession. These therapists reject the
passive, old-style therapies that emphasize personal growth over
shared commitment and take a more aggressive,
hands-around-the-neck approach to saving marriages. "They feel
therapists have been too quick in calling an end to relationships
and having people move on," says University of Chicago sociology
professor Linda Waite. The new breed also advocates premarital
skill training and early intervention in problemslearning the
ropes before tying the knot. "It's like a vaccination," says
Waite, "instead of having to do surgery when something goes
wrong."
The new, pro-marriage generation "is young, far more conservative
and more religious" than traditional therapists, says Doherty,
author of Take Back Your Marriage. "This generation has seen the
fruits of the divorce revolution. And they don't think they have
to be value-neutral about it." They also tend to be pragmatists.
Many of them favor short-term, low-cost interventions based on
methods with a record of proved success.
These qualities have drawn the support of religious leaders and
conservative politicians, including First Husband George W. Bush,
who would like to make marriage education for young couples part
of welfare reform. "This is a social movement," says Doherty,
"that involves government, church, professional and lay people."
How do these therapies and lessons in connection work? A look at
some methods of the movement:
GOING TO "PREP" SCHOOL
PREP, short for Prevention and Relationship Enhancement Program,
aims to be the industry leader in research-based couples
education. Its tenets, which emphasize structured communication,
are ingredients in a variety of programs for teens, pre-marrieds
and long-marrieds.
Rod Grimm Lewis and his wife Victoria paid $400 to attend a
two-day PREP seminar in Los Angeles in a final attempt to save
their 28-year-old marriage. "I think this will help," says
Victoria, the more eager of the two. "I think of it as
chemotherapy." Rod figures he's being a good sport. "I came
because she asked me to," he says. "I'm about 5% of the problem,
and she's 95%." Marc Sadoff, the workshop leader, says, "It's
good to hear that you can acknowledge you're 5%. So many people
can't see any role in the problem."
Positive communication, like Sadoff's comment, is the backbone of
PREP, developed in the 1980s by psychologists Howard Markman and
Scott Stanley, co-directors of the Center for Marital and Family
Studies at the University of Denver. In developing it, Markham
spent years taping couples having arguments and devising ways to
break bad habits. The method, which relies partly on videos of
other couples using the technique, is continually tweaked in
light of new research, says Stanley. "The idea was to build a
program for couples that was based on sound research," he says,
"rather than armchair clinical speculation."
Page 1 of 6 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6
Next > >
|