Why We Eat
The three reasons why humans dine
By Jeffrey Kluger; Christine Gorman; Alice Park

PHOTO ILLUSTRATION FOR TIME BY C.J.BURTON |
 |
June 7, 2004
FOR SOCIAL REASONS
For humans, food does more than merely nourish. It socializesand civilizesus as well
If you ever find yourself dining with a family in the South
African kingdom of Lesotho, you'd better have a taste for
eyeballsthat is, if you're the male head of a household.
Tradition requires the host to honor your family in a truly
special way: with the cooked head of a sheep. Everyone will be
served the feast, but only you will be presented with the eyes.
A sheep's head is a big deal in Lesotho, where most folks don't
often get to enjoy meat. When they do, they like it rich and
fatty, and they eat it right down to the offal. Presenting the
crowning part of so prized a meal to a guest is no small gesture.
For human beings, eating has never been a simple matter. To a
frog snagging a fly or a pelican nabbing a fish, food is fuel and
nothing more. To a human, the ritual of eatingthe act of
pulling up and tucking in, of passing around and helping
oneselfis one of the most primal of shared activities. We eat
together when we celebrate, and we eat together when we grieve;
we eat together when a loved one is preparing to leave, and we
eat together when the loved one returns. We solve our problems
over the family dinner table, conduct our business over the
executive lunch table, entertain guests over cake and cookies at
the coffee table.
"Interaction over food is the single most important feature of
socializing," says Sidney Mintz, professor of anthropology at
Johns Hopkins University. "The food becomes the carriage that
conveys feelings back and forth."
It's not just families that define themselves through foods.
Whole cultures do so too. Muslims eat halal and Jews eat kosher
and Roman Catholics forgo meat on Fridays. Moroccans don't eat
what Swedes eat, who don't eat what the Japanese eat, who don't
eat what Croatians eat. When families leave their home countries
and settle elsewhere, the cultural feathering they bring with
themlanguage, dress, musicis often shed within a generation.
But the foods linger. "The last part of a culture that gets lost
are the food ways," says Barrett Brenton, nutritional
anthropologist at St. John's University in New York City. "We
find comfort in our cuisines."
Although that has long been the way food works, it is becoming
less soat least in the developed world, where scarcity has been
replaced by overabundance and undernourishment by obesity.
Increasingly, the connection between eating and ritual is
becoming unhinged. We turn too much to food for solace and
celebration, and we do it with less and less reference to
traditions or even formal mealtimesto the detriment of our
figure and our health.
If the routines we have built around food are complex, it's
because we have been working on them for so long. Well before we
were very social creatures, we were decidedly hungry creatures,
and we ate anything we could lay our hands on. Insects, worms and
up to 20 kinds of game were nothing to a hunter-gatherer. As our
tastes became more refined, the number of items on our menus
shrank, mostly because we did a better job of intuiting what we
needed. Cultures that developed a taste for rice and beans didn't
know a lick about combining incomplete proteins, but that's what
they were doing. People who learned to enjoy high-fiber foods
didn't understand intestinal health, but they were helping ensure
it nonetheless. "A co-evolutionary process unfolded between
cuisines and nourishment," says Brenton. "There's nutritional
wisdom behind it all."
How and when we ate became formalized too. When food was scarce,
it had to be guarded, so families huddled close to eat what they
had caught or picked. Somewhere in there may lie the origins of
the dinner table. When food was abundant enough to share, it was
passed around mostly at celebrationsharvest festivals, when the
foods of autumn were eaten; Easter feasts, when the spring lamb
recalled both Jesus' sacrifice and the story of Passover. "The
foods became the anchor to which the rituals connected," says
Brenton. "You don't see the same foods at a wedding as at a
funeral as at a naming ceremony."
Page 1 of 3 1 | 2 | 3 Next > >
[an error occurred while processing this directive]
|