Interview: "I Stand for Peace"
TIME: What do you make of [political opponent Mahinda] Rajapakse's hard-line approach to the peace process?
Ranil Wickremsinghe: He has no solution. And if you don't go for a solution, you will inevitably go back to war. He has become a prisoner of the JVP [the extremist Marxist-nationalist Janatha Vimukthi Perumuna, with whom Rajapakse is allied]. What can you expect from him? He has joined the warmongers. I stand for a better life for the people of this country. Which means peace and development.
TIME: Some say Sri Lanka is already back at war.
RW: We are not back at war. We have had cease-fire violations, but we're not back at war. [Gestures at a group of soldiers ambling nearby]. Do you think you'd see soldiers walking like that if there was a war?
TIME: But there has been a serious deterioration in security.
RW: It is a serious deterioration. Killings have gone up. Senior people on all sides are being killed. It's a very, very serious situation and it shouldn't have come to this. The tsunami had a healing effect, but the JVP played politics and the government could not utilize that popular sentiment.
TIME: Do you think the Tamil Tigers will make good on their threats to resume fighting?
RW: The L.T.T.E.'s mood is one of frustration. If the Tamils and the L.T.T.E. feel they have no other option, then we will slide towards crisis. If we try to go back on what has been agreed, it will be a major crisis.
TIME: Can the situation be saved?
RW: It can be saved. It will take two to three years to bring about peace. That's why I have asked the S.L.F.P. [Rajapakse's Sri Lanka Freedom Party] to work with me in a government of national unity. Then we will all be winners.
TIME: Given the fractious history of Sri Lankan politics, isn't that a little optimistic?
RW: It'll be tough, I don't underestimate it. It'll be a change of culture for Sri Lankan politics and a change of destiny for Sri Lanka. The political forces in Sri Lanka are polarized in a way that has not been seen for a long time. But I don't think the people are polarized in that way. And [changing our politics] won't be as tough as war. Besides, what are the other options? Are we going to start fighting again? We have got to move forward, and to do that we need to share power.
Most Popular »
- Parents' Sex Talk with Kids: Too Little, Too Late
- Did Amanda Knox Get a Fair Murder Trial?
- Campus Smoking Bans? Some Saying 'Lighten Up'
- The Growing Backlash Against Overparenting
- Obama Shrinks the War on Terrorism
- Is California Sold on Gov. Meg Whitman?
- How Strong Is the Evidence Against Amanda Knox?
- Humanure: Goodbye, Toilets. Hello, Extreme Composting
- Astronomers Spy a New Planet-Like Object
- Many Mutual Funds Are Up 50% in '09 But Beware
- Sex, Television and Berlusconi's Path to Power
- Can an Eagle Hug a Panda?
- Protecting Jungles: One Way to Combat Global Warming
- The State of Hillary: A Mixed Record on the Job
- Dubai: 10 Things to Do in 24 Hours
- Washington: 10 Things to Do in 24 Hours
- Bernard Kerik
- Can China's Backwaters Save the Global Economy?
- Rome: 10 Things to Do in 24 Hours
- Can Dems Resolve Their Abortion Split?



RSS