-
ADD TIME NEWS
- MOBILE APPS
- NEWSLETTERS
Is North Korea Behind the Cyberattacks?

If North Korea is really behind the cyberattacks on U.S. and South Korean websites over the past few days, as South Korea has claimed, why hasn't it taken responsibility? The Kim Jong Il regime has never been shy of owning up to its mischief: if anything, it tends to exaggerate its ability to do far-flung damage. And yet, there has been no chest-thumping from Pyongyang about the "glorious destruction of the powerful computer systems of the evil enemies of our Dear Leader."
Related
This uncharacteristic reticence could undermine the initial assumption that the attacks originated in North Korea. Indeed, five days after the first attacks, there has been no proof of Pyongyang's involvement. Unlike their South Korean counterparts, U.S. officials have pointedly avoided blaming North Korea, or any other country, for the attacks. (See pictures of the rise of Kim Jong Il.)
Cyberexperts like Dale Meyerrose, who recently retired as chief information officer for the director of national intelligence, say it may be weeks before it becomes clear who was responsible for the mischief. In fact, if the attackers were smart enough, we may never be certain of their identity.
But even if the trail does lead to North Korea, there's no reason to believe it ends there. Meyerrose, now with the consulting firm Harris Corp., points out that hackers routinely route their attacks through other countries and networks, using multiple cutouts to evade detection. "In every attack I've ever seen, the attackers were careful to use cybersurrogates," he says.
Another wrinkle: once the initial attack (wherever it may have originated) was under way, it's entirely possible that other, unconnected hackers joined the fray. "If you're a hacker, and you see something like that going on, you can use the opportunity to test out your capabilities, masking them under the original attack," says Roger Baker, East Asia analyst at Stratfor, a global intelligence company. (Read a brief history of cybercrime.)
So why did suspicion fall on the Kim regime? The South Koreans immediately blamed their cousins to the north, but Seoul fingers Pyongyang for all sorts of things, and not always with much to back up its claims. But in this case, there is some circumstantial evidence to support their allegations.
The timing of the attacks is one: they coincided with the anniversary of the birth of North Korea's founder and Kim's dad, Kim Il Sung, an occasion you might reasonably expect the regime to celebrate with some long-distance shenanigans. And the regime is already embroiled in conflict with the U.S. over nukes and missiles; a hack attack would be just one more inflammatory act by a country that specializes in inflammatory actions.
The choice of targets is also instructive: Who else but North Korea would attack both South Korea and the U.S.?
- 1
- 2
- NEXT PAGE »
Most Popular »
- Prehistoric Super-Crocodiles May Have Dined on Dinosaurs
- The Growing Backlash Against Overparenting
- Amid Concern About India's Lost Clout, Singh Goes to Washington
- Woman Loses Benefits over Facebook Photo
- Toilets
- The Fall of Greg Craig, Obama's Top Lawyer
- Can the A380 Bring the Party Back to the Skies?
- Why Exercise Won't Make You Thin
- Man in Coma Heard Everything for 23 Years
- The Political Fallout of Egypt's Soccer War
- The Growing Backlash Against Overparenting
- Prehistoric Super-Crocodiles May Have Dined on Dinosaurs
- How One Army Town Copes With Post- Traumatic Stress
- Will Private Equity Be the Next Meltdown?
- Troubling Rise of Facebook's Top Game Company
- Female Sexual Dysfunction: Myth or Malady?
- Man in Coma Heard Everything for 23 Years
- Toilets
- Beijing: 10 Things to Do in 24 Hours
- The Fall of Greg Craig, Obama's Top Lawyer









RSS