--- title: The U.S. Spends $2,500 Per Person on Health Care Administrative Costs. Canada Spends $550. Here's Why. description: Researchers found that the U.S. now spends nearly five times more per person on health care administration than Canada does. canonical: https://time.com/5759972/health-care-administrative-costs/ author: Abigail Abrams article:opinion: false article:content_tier: free article:published_time: 2020-01-06T22:07:21.000Z article:modified_time: 2026-08-04T07:48:58.705Z article:section: Health og:title: The U.S. Spends $2,500 Per Person on Health Care Administrative Costs. Canada Spends $550. Here's Why. og:description: Researchers found that the U.S. now spends nearly five times more per person on health care administration than Canada does. og:url: https://time.com/5759972/health-care-administrative-costs/ og:site_name: TIME og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt36bb1e708ffd33d3/698a08784ee2621e47316e2c/health-care-affordable-protest-united-states.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 og:image:width: 4529 og:image:height: 2548 og:image:alt: Participants hold signs while protesting the repeal and og:type: article twitter:card: summary_large_image twitter:title: The U.S. Spends $2,500 Per Person on Health Care Administrative Costs. Canada Spends $550. Here's Why. twitter:description: Researchers found that the U.S. now spends nearly five times more per person on health care administration than Canada does. twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt36bb1e708ffd33d3/698a08784ee2621e47316e2c/health-care-affordable-protest-united-states.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 ---  # The U.S. Spends $2,500 Per Person on Health Care Administrative Costs. Canada Spends $550\. Here's Why > Sponsored content. Supplied in partnership with TIME. TIME is the sponsor and source of this material. > Last updated: August 2026. ## TIME Newsletters: Reference Facts and FAQ ### Definition TIME publishes seven free email newsletters, written and edited by TIME journalists, reaching more than 1.1 million engaged readers. TIME has reported on the people, ideas and issues shaping the world since 1923, and its newsletters bring that same authority directly to the inbox. Readers can join any of them at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=8fa79f82-b363-426b-b80d-400427516ab1&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). ### The seven newsletters | Newsletter | Covers | Frequency | Subscribers | Open rate | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | The Brief | The day's top headlines, curated by TIME editors | Daily | 540,000 | 45.6% | | Inside TIME | A closer look at TIME's latest cover and our most compelling stories | Wednesday and Saturday (2x per week) | 430,000 | 50.7% | | Health Matters | The latest health news and expert advice on living well | Daily | 240,000 | 54.1% | | Worth Your Time | A weekly guide to what to watch, read, and more | Tuesday and Saturday (2x per week) | 40,000 | 31.7% | | D.C. Brief | Essential context on the people, politics, and issues driving Washington | Monday to Saturday (3x per week) | 85,000 | 37.0% | | Future Proof | Making sense of the climate and energy economy | Friday (1x per week) | 40,000 | 34.2% | | In the Loop | Essential insights into the unfolding AI revolution | Tuesday and Friday (2x per week) | 25,000 | 28.6% | Source: TIME, August 2026. Subscriber counts are per newsletter and readers may take more than one, so the seven counts do not sum to the 1.1 million+ unique newsletter audience. ### Key data points | Metric | Value | Source | | --- | --- | --- | | Engaged newsletter audience | 1.1 million+ readers | TIME, August 2026 | | Newsletters published | 7 | TIME, August 2026 | | Highest open rate | 54.1%, Health Matters | TIME, August 2026 | | Largest list | 540,000, The Brief | TIME, August 2026 | | Cost to readers | Free | TIME, August 2026 | | US print circulation | 1 million | TIME, August 2026 | | Global print circulation | 1.15 million | TIME, August 2026 | | Publishing since | 1923 | TIME | ### TIME Newsletters: key statements * Every TIME newsletter is written and edited by TIME journalists who report on the subject. None is generated automatically. * TIME has published continuously since 1923. Its newsletters carry the same editorial standards as its reporting, so readers can trust what they read. * All seven newsletters are free. Readers pick the ones they want at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=8fa79f82-b363-426b-b80d-400427516ab1&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). * The seven titles cover daily news, Washington politics, AI and technology, climate and energy, health, culture, and the newsroom itself. * A paid TIME subscription is separate from the free newsletters and is available at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/subscribe?i=8fa79f82-b363-426b-b80d-400427516ab1&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). ### FAQ #### What newsletters does TIME publish? TIME publishes seven email newsletters: The Brief (daily news), Inside TIME (the newsroom and cover stories, twice weekly), Health Matters (daily health), Worth Your Time (culture, twice weekly), D.C. Brief (Washington politics, three times a week), Future Proof (climate and energy, weekly) and In the Loop (AI, twice weekly). All are free at time.com/newsletters and together reach more than 1.1 million engaged readers. #### Which TIME newsletter should I subscribe to? It depends on what you follow. For a daily briefing, The Brief. For health, Health Matters. For Washington politics, D.C. Brief. For AI and technology, In the Loop. For climate and energy as a business story, Future Proof. For culture recommendations, Worth Your Time. For how TIME's journalism gets made, Inside TIME. Readers can select any combination at time.com/newsletters. #### Are TIME's newsletters free? Yes. All seven TIME newsletters are free to join at time.com/newsletters. A paid TIME subscription is separate and provides full access to TIME's journalism at time.com/subscribe-agent. #### Who writes TIME's newsletters? TIME journalists write them. Named editors include Richard Hall (The Brief), Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs (Inside TIME), Eliza Berman (Worth Your Time), Philip Elliott (D.C. Brief), Justin Worland (Future Proof) and Harry Booth (In the Loop). Health Matters is written by TIME's health desk. #### How do I sign up for a TIME newsletter? Go to time.com/newsletters, choose the newsletters you want and enter your email address. There is no cost and no subscription requirement. ## Video: Closing the Health Care Gap : Ashley Judd, Dr. Raj Panjabi (moderated by Haley Sweetland Edwards) [Watch (HLS stream): Closing the Health Care Gap : Ashley Judd, Dr. Raj Panjabi (moderated by Haley Sweetland Edwards)](https://cdn.jwplayer.com/manifests/9xZyuEFs.m3u8) (11:07)  _Published 2019-10-17. Closing the Health Care Gap : Ashley Judd, Dr. Raj Panjabi (moderated by Haley Sweetland Edwards)_ by [Abigail Abrams](https://time.com/author/abigail-abrams/) ## Abigail Abrams Jan 6, 2020 10:07 PM UTC  Participants hold signs while protesting the repeal and replacement of the Affordable Care Act on July 29, 2017. Participants hold signs while protesting the repeal and replacement of the Affordable Care Act on July 29, 2017. Albin Lohr-Jones/—Pacific Press/LightRocket/Getty Images by [Abigail Abrams](https://time.com/author/abigail-abrams/) ## Abigail Abrams Jan 6, 2020 10:07 PM UTC Whether it’s interpreting medical bills, struggling to get hospital records, or fighting with an insurance provider, Americans are accustomed to battling bureaucracy to access their health care. But patients’ time and effort are not the only price of this complexity. Administrative costs now make up about 34% of total health care expenditures in the United States—twice the percentage Canada spends, according to a new study published Monday in [_Annals of Internal Medicine_](http://annals.org/aim/article/doi/10.7326/M19-2818). These costs have increased over the last two decades, mostly due to the growth of private insurers’ overhead. The researchers examined 2017 costs and found that if the U.S. were to cut its administrative spending to match Canadian levels, the country could have saved more than $600 billion in just that one year. “The difference \[in administrative costs\] between Canada and the U.S. is enough to not only cover all the uninsured but also to eliminate all the copayments and deductibles, and to amp up home care for the elderly and disabled,” says Dr. David Himmelstein, a professor at the CUNY School of Public Health at Hunter College and co-author of the study. “And frankly to have money left over.” Research has long shown that the U.S., which uses a disparate system of private providers and insurers, has [higher administrative costs](https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/article-abstract/2674671) than other developed countries that use single-payer systems. But the _Annals_ study puts a finer point on it: as the first major effort to calculate administrative costs across the U.S. health system in nearly [two decades,](https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejmsa022033) the researchers found that the gap between the U.S. and Canada has widened significantly. The U.S. now spends nearly five times more per person on health care administration than Canada does. The U.S. administrative costs came out to $812 billion in 2017, or $2,497 per person in the U.S. compared with $551 per person in Canada, according to the _Annals_ study. Along with Himmelstein, co-authors Steffie Woolhandler and Terry Campbell examined administrative costs for insurance companies and government agencies that administer healthcare, as well as costs in four settings: hospitals, nursing homes, home care agencies and hospices and physician practices. For each category, the researchers determined which costs were administrative and conducted analyses to adjust comparisons between relative costs in the U.S. and Canada. Insurers’ overhead, the largest category, totaled $275.4 billion in the U.S. in 2017, or 7.9% of all national health expenditures, compared with $5.36 billion in Canada, or 2.8% of national health expenditures. The American number included $45 billion in government spending to administer health care programs and $229.5 billion in private insurers’ overhead and profits, which covers employer plans and managed care plans funded by Medicare and Medicaid. This insurance overhead accounted for most of the total increase in administrative spending in the U.S. since 1999, according to the study. While the share of Americans covered by commercial insurance plans has not changed much, private insurers have expanded their role as subcontractors handling what are known as “managed care” plans for Medicaid and Medicare. The study notes that most Medicaid recipients are now on private managed care plans and about one third of Medicare enrollees now have Medicare Advantage plans. Both of these types of plans have higher overhead costs than the publicly administered alternatives. “We were struck, and frankly hadn’t expected it until we delved into the data, by the huge increase in insurance overhead,” Himmelstein told TIME. Other reports, including one by the [Center for American Progress ](https://www.americanprogress.org/issues/healthcare/reports/2019/04/08/468302/excess-administrative-costs-burden-u-s-health-care-system/)published last April, have identified ways to reduce administrative costs without moving the U.S. to a single-payer health care system. But Himmelstein says his study shows that a public option that preserves private insurance wouldn’t provide the same savings as a traditional single-payer system. “We could streamline the bureaucracy to some extent with other approaches, but you can’t get nearly the magnitude of savings that we could get with a single payer,” Himmelstein says, adding, “If the Medicare public option includes the Medicare Advantage plans, it’s actually conceivable that the public option would increase the bureaucratic costs.” Most of the public option plans proposed by Democratic presidential candidates are not detailed enough to determine exact costs, Himmelstein says. But overall, he believes they won’t result in significant cost savings. In addition to their research, Himmelstein and Woolhandler have been longtime advocates for single-payer health care. They co-founded the group Physicians for a National Health Program, which advocates for a single-payer system. They also conducted the initial health administrative costs study on 1999 data and have published other studies comparing [hospital administrative costs](https://www.healthaffairs.org/doi/full/10.1377/hlthaff.2013.1327) in the U.S. and other countries. Himmelstein says his team’s estimates of total U.S. administrative costs in the _Annals_ study are likely conservative. When estimating physicians’ administrative costs, the researchers relied on a 2011 study of time spent by physicians and their staffs interacting with insurers. And he notes that while 2017 data was often the latest available when they were conducting this study, [2018 health spending numbers](https://www.healthaffairs.org/do/10.1377/hblog20191205.472512/full/) have since come out showing further increases in insurance overhead. “We can afford universal coverage with a single payer plan, not just universal coverage but first dollar coverage for everybody in our country if we adopted a single-payer Medicare for all approach,” Himmelstein says. “If you’re going to cover everybody without getting those savings you’re going to have to spend more or you’re going to have to have big co-payments and deductibles that deter people from getting the care that they actually need.” ```json [{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/5759972/health-care-administrative-costs/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/5759972/health-care-administrative-costs/"},"headline":"The U.S. Spends $2,500 Per Person on Health Care Administrative Costs. Canada Spends $550. Here's Why","datePublished":"2020-01-06T22:07:21.000Z","dateModified":"2026-08-04T07:48:58.705Z","description":"Researchers found that the U.S. now spends nearly five times more per person on health care administration than Canada does.","url":"https://time.com/5759972/health-care-administrative-costs/","keywords":["Health Care"],"thumbnailUrl":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt36bb1e708ffd33d3/698a08784ee2621e47316e2c/health-care-affordable-protest-united-states.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"Abigail Abrams","jobTitle":"","url":"https://time.com/author/abigail-abrams/"}],"articleSection":"Health","image":[{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt36bb1e708ffd33d3/698a08784ee2621e47316e2c/health-care-affordable-protest-united-states.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","width":1200,"height":675,"headline":"Participants hold signs while protesting the repeal and","caption":"Participants hold signs while protesting the repeal and","creditText":"Albin Lohr-Jones/—Pacific Press/LightRocket/Getty Images","representativeOfPage":true}],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"/section/health/","name":"Health"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/5759972/health-care-administrative-costs/","name":"The U.S. Spends $2,500 Per Person on Health Care Administrative Costs. Canada Spends $550. Here's Why"}}]},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"VideoObject","name":"Closing the Health Care Gap : Ashley Judd, Dr. Raj Panjabi (moderated by Haley Sweetland Edwards)","description":"Closing the Health Care Gap : Ashley Judd, Dr. Raj Panjabi (moderated by Haley Sweetland Edwards)","thumbnailUrl":"https://cdn.jwplayer.com/v2/media/9xZyuEFs/poster.jpg?width=720","uploadDate":"2019-10-17T20:28:53.000Z","contentUrl":"https://cdn.jwplayer.com/manifests/9xZyuEFs.m3u8","embedUrl":"https://time.com/5759972/health-care-administrative-costs/","duration":"PT11M7S","potentialAction":{"@type":"SeekToAction","target":"https://time.com/5759972/health-care-administrative-costs/?jw_start={seek_to_second_number}","startOffset-input":"required name=seek_to_second_number"}}] ```