Displaying Dissent

Newsha Tavakolian / Polaris for TIME A U.S. flag painted on pavement by the Iranian regime is exhibited at the "America the Beautiful" show.

Tehran’s most avant-garde art gallery sits on a quiet, treelined street in the midtown area of the city. Only a tiny white sign with black lettering alerts those looking that they’ve found their destination. But on Friday nights, the Aaran Gallery is the coolest place in town. Girls in heels, their headscarves slipping back to reveal fantastical upsweeps, hipster boys in skinny jeans and gray-haired intellectuals who look as if they’ve just stumbled out of the smoke-filled back rooms of a French café mingle and discuss the art that surrounds them. At one opening on a late August afternoon, there was even more to talk about than usual. The show’s theme: “America the Beautiful.”

Inside the packed space, patrons laugh at an installation showing a home video of Iranian breakdancers doing their best to impress guests at an early 1980s wedding. It’s paired with a photograph of Iranians storming the U.S. embassy in 1979 for a piece titled Cultural Invasion, making the point that the U.S. has been more successful at invading Iran’s culture — pirated downloads of Desperate Housewives, The Big Bang Theory and Vampire Diaries are all the rage with young Tehranis — than Iran has been in influencing America. Attendees bounce Ping-Pong balls scattered around the gallery, each imprinted with blue and red stars and the names of famous Americans, ranging from Marilyn Monroe to Barack Obama. And they step carefully around a U.S. flag painted on a piece of sidewalk that has been replanted on the gallery floor — one of thousands painted all over Iran by the government and meant to be stomped on as a symbol of scorn for the U.S. “America is bigger than the geography of the country. It’s an idea,” says the exhibition’s 28-year-old curator, Mahoor Toosi. Most of the show’s young artists have never visited the U.S., and yet it has left an indelible impression on their lives. “The question of what America really is wasn’t my concern. Each and every person has a different view of America. I wanted to capture their Persian views.”

As Iran continues to defy the West over its nuclear program and suffers economically under a welter of sanctions, even toying with images of America — let alone the Islamic Republic’s depiction of a country still referred to by some as the Great Satan — might seem politically risky. Hundreds of political activists, journalists and critics of the regime have been arrested, imprisoned and killed in the hard-line crackdown of recent years. The government has also stifled Iran’s music and film industries. Threatened from within and without, the regime demands loyalty from all. Dissent has become distinctly dangerous.

(PHOTOS: Making Carpets in Iran)

That makes the Iranian contemporary-art scene all the more remarkable. Tehran has so far allowed it to flourish not only in the form of galleries like Aaran but also in prolific shows and sales abroad. Why? It’s partly thanks to a loophole in U.S. and European sanctions that allows those countries to import certain fine art from Iran. The regime’s need for hard foreign currency, especially since the Iranian rial has lost more than 75% of its value in the past year, has helped protect the market, as has demand from investors seeking safe havens from hyperinflation for their savings. Most of the art is far too subversive to be shown in Iran and is sold to buyers overseas. So in a twist, as the threat of war with Israel looms and Tehran cracks down on protesters weary of Western sanctions that are making it harder for ordinary people to get by, the government is quietly tolerating dissident imagery to generate the revenue it needs to help stabilize an economy on the brink.

The contemporary-art movement in Iran got a boost under the last Shah, whose wife Farah was a collector of Western and Iranian art. The bulk of her collection today resides in the Tehran Museum of Contemporary Art, the opening and closing of which depends on the mood of the regime. Some days the public is barred from seeing what certain clerics may view as decadent or indecent Western images.

After the 1979 revolution, the contemporary-art movement stalled, only to be revived by the relatively liberal cleric Mohammed Khatami, who became President in 1997. He set aside part of the national budget — albeit a tiny fraction, less than one-tenth of 1% — to support art. His government funneled those funds to galleries, studios and contemporary artists, helping renovate a wonderful space for young artists called the Arts House, a former army barracks. In recent years the conservative government of President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad has steered that money to calligraphy and more traditional Persian arts. But the contemporary-art movement has thrived long past Khatami’s fall, even as the regime grew more oppressive — or perhaps because of it. “A lot of [Iranian contemporary art] is directly related to politics. A lot of it is happening because of the pressure,” says Nazila Noebashari, Aaran’s owner. “It’s like a cooking pot in so many ways.” The more pressure the government puts on its people to conform, the more they express their distinctiveness through art.

VIDEO: Iran: Life Under the Sanctions

Art and politics overlapped directly in 2009 when one of the pro-democracy Green movement’s leaders, former Prime Minister Mir-Hossein Mousavi, a painter, called his followers to the streets and nearly overthrew the government. Since then, he has been under house arrest at an undisclosed location. In those three years, almost any art with political themes has been exported rather than shown in Iran. After the uprising, Alireza Fani, a young artist living in northern Tehran, created a series of photographs depicting women, their heads bare, standing in the deserted streets where the protests took place. The tone is industrial gray, and gutted fish float in front of the women, representing the sexual assaults that happened during the crackdown. “I was told to keep them for myself — I couldn’t show them in Iran,” says Fani, whose previous works have sold for as much as $21,000 at auction at Christie’s in Dubai.

“You have to be very careful,” says Amirhossein Etemad, who owns Etemad, another well-known contemporary-art gallery in Tehran. “They would close the gallery,” he says. “We send photos to the government. They control us. I turn down 30% of the art that’s brought to me, as it’s too edgy, too extreme.” He owns a second gallery in Dubai, “where you can be freer. Not as free as London, New York or Paris. But freer than here.” In early September, Etemad’s Tehran gallery was showing bronze statues of mini swimming Buddhas by a famous Iranian actress while his Dubai gallery was showing a young artist’s giant plastic Iranian coins. Covered in fur and trendy cell-phone covers, the coins were a commentary on the adolescent silliness and one-sidedness of Iran’s currency policy.

Even the act of men and women mingling at the galleries can be dangerous, since it is banned by the government. There are no bars or clubs in Iran. Restaurants are for families, not dates. Over the years, music and cinema have been remolded into the regime’s Islamist vision. Women can’t sing in public unless no men are present or unless the female singers are part of a mixed-gender choir, and theater is practically a religious experience. “I came with some of my girlfriends,” a 23-year-old woman in a green scarf and black-and-white dress told me at the “America the Beautiful” opening. She and her friends — mostly fellow engineering students at a nearby college — were huddled in a circle at the center of the gallery. As she spoke to me, a couple of them were making eyes at a group of young men near the garden door. “I like the art, and I like the chance to discuss it with others we meet,” the woman said.

(PHOTOS: New Exhibit Examines Art in War-Torn Afghanistan)

Just as contemporary art has become an outlet for dissent, creativity and even flirtation, so too has it become a sanctuary for anxious investors. The sanctions have trapped enormous capital in Iran. There are only so many golden coins rich Iranians can buy or construction projects they can invest in as inflation, by some estimates, tops 200% per year, though the official figure is 23.5%. Art is an investment that, if chosen wisely, can yield substantial returns over time. Four years ago, Iranian artist Farhad Moshiri’s paintings and sculptures sold for about $5,000, says Noebashari of the Aaran Gallery. Now at auction his work goes for anything from $80,000 to $600,000. The market is also fueled by expatriate Iranians, many of whom view buying Iranian contemporary art as a form of patriotism. Iran is the largest producer of art in the region, accounting for at least a third of all Middle Eastern art sold by Christie’s. “There are many wealthy collectors who only buy Iranian art,” says Aquamarina Adonopoulou, assistant director of Dubai’s Green Art Gallery, which represents several Iranian artists. “Some of it is truly avant-garde, and some of it just hitches to the political bandwagon. We try to find artists who produce for themselves and not for a fad.”

Two little villages of galleries focusing mainly on Iranian art have formed in Dubai. And yet, when Iranian artists are invited to go and work in Dubai, they often decline. “The environment is important to their work,” says Kourosh Nouri, owner of the Carbon 12 Gallery in the Emirates. “They say Dubai is too sterile, too staid.” At home, there is no lack of inspiration, however terrifying that may occasionally be. The Green movement remains fractured and scattered, many of its leaders still imprisoned, under house arrest or closely watched by the Revolutionary Guards. Even at Aaran, when you ask what it means to show Iranian interpretations of the American Dream, the curator Toosi focuses on the American Dream rather than anything related to Iran. “The Founding Fathers had a dream, and it seems as if it is the only dream in the whole world that has come to life,” he says. “That’s the paradox — the dream vs. reality. The dream as reality, that’s surreal.” What does this say about Iranians’ dreams for Iran? He shakes his head, “I cannot,” he says — or perhaps he’s afraid to — “answer that.”

MORE: The Art of Museum Diplomacy

Tap to read full story

Your browser is out of date. Please update your browser at http://update.microsoft.com